Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RYCFX vs SHSAX
RYCFX vs SHSAX Comparison
Open Charts RYCFX vs SHSAX
RYCFX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RYCFX vs. SHSAX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RYCFX is a Buy and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 5.93B vs. RYCFX (110M). SHSAX pays higher dividends than RYCFX: SHSAX (0.27) vs RYCFX (0.00). RYCFX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: RYCFX (25 years) vs SHSAX (27 years). RYCFX (2.43) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). RYCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. SHSAX (43.00). SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCFX: SHSAX (1000) vs RYCFX (2500). RYCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.52 vs. SHSAX (3.83). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -17.32 vs. RYCFX (-37.70).
| RYCFX | SHSAX | RYCFX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.09 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.09 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.262 | -1.344 | -540% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110M | 5.93B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.27 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.52 | 3.83 | 379% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.31 | -3.02 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.70 | -17.32 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.39 | 40.81 | -50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers