Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RYSGX vs WCMLX
RYSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts RYSGX vs WCMLX
RYSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RYSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RYSGX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMLX has more cash in the bank: 51.9M vs. RYSGX (7.97M). RYSGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . RYSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: RYSGX (22 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RYSGX (1.60). RYSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1133.00 vs. WCMLX (89.00). RYSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: RYSGX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). RYSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.36 vs. WCMLX (17.02). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 3.16 vs. RYSGX (-22.67).
| RYSGX | WCMLX | RYSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 0.99 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.79 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.448 | 11.410 | 223% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.97M | 51.9M | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.36 | 17.02 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.40 | 32.50 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.67 | 3.16 | -717% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers