SAN
Price
$5.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
12 days until earnings call
SMFG
Price
$12.96
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
28 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SAN vs SMFG

Header iconSAN vs SMFG Comparison
Open Charts SAN vs SMFGBanner chart's image
Banco Santander SA
Price$5.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.11M
CapitalizationN/A
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group
Price$12.96
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$966.77K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
SAN vs SMFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
SAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
SAN vs. SMFG commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SAN is a StrongSell and SMFG is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (SAN: $5.01 vs. SMFG: $12.96)
Brand notoriety: SAN and SMFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SAN: 96% vs. SMFG: 64%
Market capitalization -- SAN: $76.74B vs. SMFG: $74.81B
SAN [@Major Banks] is valued at $76.74B. SMFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $74.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SAN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SAN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SMFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAN is a better buy in the long-term than SMFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SAN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SAN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SMFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMFG is a better buy in the short-term than SAN.

Price Growth

SAN (@Major Banks) experienced а +0.80% price change this week, while SMFG (@Major Banks) price change was +3.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

SAN is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

SMFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.07% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAN($76.7B) and SMFG($74.8B) have the same market capitalization . SMFG has higher P/E ratio than SAN: SMFG (13.83) vs SAN (6.83). SMFG YTD gains are higher at: 35.804 vs. SAN (23.496). SAN has less debt than SMFG: SAN (311B) vs SMFG (32.98T). SMFG has higher revenues than SAN: SMFG (3.98T) vs SAN (59.9B).
SANSMFGSAN / SMFG
Capitalization76.7B74.8B103%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.49635.80466%
P/E Ratio6.8313.8349%
Revenue59.9B3.98T2%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt311B32.98T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAN vs SMFG: Fundamental Ratings
SAN
SMFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1816
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3910
SMR RATING
1..100
21
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4851
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6379
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAN's Valuation (17) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMFG (99). This means that SAN’s stock grew significantly faster than SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SAN (39). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to SAN’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SAN (2). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to SAN’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SMFG (51). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SMFG (79). This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SANSMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

SAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAN has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAN jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAN
1D Price
Change %
SAN100%
-0.20%
BBVA - SAN
78%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
BCS - SAN
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
ING - SAN
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
EWBC - SAN
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
UBS - SAN
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
More

SMFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMFG has been closely correlated with MUFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMFG jumps, then MUFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMFG
1D Price
Change %
SMFG100%
+1.01%
MUFG - SMFG
89%
Closely correlated
+1.90%
SMFNF - SMFG
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
NABZY - SMFG
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
HSBC - SMFG
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
C - SMFG
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.57%
More