SAND
Price
$10.97
Change
-$0.04 (-0.36%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
3.2B
73 days until earnings call
STLRF
Price
$0.74
Change
+$0.06 (+8.82%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
89.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SAND vs STLRF

Header iconSAND vs STLRF Comparison
Open Charts SAND vs STLRFBanner chart's image
Sandstorm Gold
Price$10.97
Change-$0.04 (-0.36%)
Volume$3.75M
Capitalization3.2B
STLLR GOLD
Price$0.74
Change+$0.06 (+8.82%)
Volume$29.4K
Capitalization89.71M
SAND vs STLRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SAND vs. STLRF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SAND is a Buy and STLRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (SAND: $10.97 vs. STLRF: $0.74)
Brand notoriety: SAND and STLRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SAND: 50% vs. STLRF: 113%
Market capitalization -- SAND: $3.2B vs. STLRF: $89.71M
SAND [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.2B. STLRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $89.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SAND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTLRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SAND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STLRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, STLRF is a better buy in the long-term than SAND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SAND’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STLRF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SAND’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STLRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SAND and STLRF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SAND (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.39% price change this week, while STLRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +21.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3316.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

SAND is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.27% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAND($3.2B) has a higher market cap than STLRF($89.7M). SAND YTD gains are higher at: 96.595 vs. STLRF (28.867). SAND has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 145M vs. STLRF (-33.09M). STLRF has more cash in the bank: 15.9M vs. SAND (14.8M). STLRF has less debt than SAND: STLRF (1.2M) vs SAND (315M). SAND has higher revenues than STLRF: SAND (194M) vs STLRF (0).
SANDSTLRFSAND / STLRF
Capitalization3.2B89.7M3,562%
EBITDA145M-33.09M-438%
Gain YTD96.59528.867335%
P/E Ratio91.42N/A-
Revenue194M0-
Total Cash14.8M15.9M93%
Total Debt315M1.2M26,360%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAND vs STLRF: Fundamental Ratings
SAND
STLRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2727
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
79100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3748
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STLRF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAND (75) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that STLRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAND’s over the last 12 months.

SAND's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as STLRF (100) in the null industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

SAND's SMR Rating (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as STLRF (100) in the null industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

SAND's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as STLRF (48) in the null industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

SAND's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as STLRF (100) in the null industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SANDSTLRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CDTI1.890.29
+17.85%
CDTI Advanced Materials, Inc.
CSNVF19.42N/A
N/A
Corbion NV
KBCSF105.70N/A
N/A
KBC Group SA
VLVOF2.19N/A
N/A
VOLVO CAR AB
IXAQF11.94N/A
N/A
IX Acquisition Corp.

SAND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAND has been closely correlated with AGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAND jumps, then AGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAND
1D Price
Change %
SAND100%
-0.36%
AGI - SAND
77%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
AEM - SAND
76%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
WPM - SAND
75%
Closely correlated
+0.67%
OR - SAND
74%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
NGD - SAND
73%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
More

STLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STLRF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STLRF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STLRF
1D Price
Change %
STLRF100%
+8.35%
PAAS - STLRF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
AGI - STLRF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
AU - STLRF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
SAND - STLRF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
RGLD - STLRF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
More