SAP vs UMMA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SAP is a Buy and UMMA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SAP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while.
- SAP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SAP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- SAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
SAP (@Packaged Software) experienced а -7.28% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.60%.
Reported Earning Dates
SAP is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-4.54% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
SAP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| SAP | UMMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 59% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 79% |
UMMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMMA has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMMA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMMA | 100% | -7.04% | ||
| ASML - UMMA | 73% Closely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| TSM - UMMA | 69% Closely correlated | -6.72% | ||
| SAP - UMMA | 60% Loosely correlated | -5.99% | ||
| BHP - UMMA | 58% Loosely correlated | -9.49% | ||
| CP - UMMA | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
More | ||||