Advertisement
SB vs ZIM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SB is a Buy and ZIM is a StrongBuy.
SB | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| SB | ZIM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 61% | 5 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while ZIM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- SB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- ZIM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZIM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- ZIM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
SB (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +8.36% price change this week, while ZIM (@Marine Shipping) price change was +1.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.14%.
Reported Earning Dates
SB is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
ZIM is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Marine Shipping (-0.32% weekly)The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TXS | 41.37 | 0.35 | +0.85% |
| Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) | |||
| HEDG | 30.73 | N/A | +0.01% |
| Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF (HEDG) | |||
| PCIG | 9.27 | N/A | N/A |
| Polen Capital International Growth ETF | |||
| JPXN | 103.05 | -0.36 | -0.35% |
| iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN) | |||
| CQQQ | 44.55 | -0.35 | -0.78% |
| Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) | |||
SB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SB has been loosely correlated with HSHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SB jumps, then HSHP could also see price increases.
ZIM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZIM has been loosely correlated with SHIP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZIM jumps, then SHIP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZIM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIM | 100% | +1.47% | ||
| SHIP - ZIM | 38% Loosely correlated | +5.61% | ||
| GSL - ZIM | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| MATX - ZIM | 33% Loosely correlated | +2.67% | ||
| CMRE - ZIM | 32% Poorly correlated | +3.68% | ||
| SB - ZIM | 31% Poorly correlated | +4.68% | ||
More | ||||