Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SBASX vs WCMLX
SBASX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts SBASX vs WCMLX
Segall Bryant &Hamill Small Cap Cre Ins
Price$12.58
Change+$0.04 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.86M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.09
Change+$0.05 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.13M
SBASX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SBASX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBASX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBASX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. WCMLX (41.1M). SBASX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: SBASX (0.22) vs WCMLX (0.00). SBASX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: SBASX (6 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than SBASX (1.13). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. SBASX (40.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBASX: WCMLX (100000) vs SBASX (250000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.18 vs. SBASX (-8.26). SBASX return over 5 years is better than : 11.97 vs. WCMLX (-0.99).
| SBASX | WCMLX | SBASX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.79 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.634 | 1.400 | -45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 100000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.9M | 41.1M | 228% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.26 | -2.18 | 380% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.17 | 20.96 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.97 | -0.99 | -1,213% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |