Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SBASX vs WCMLX
SBASX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts SBASX vs WCMLX
SBASX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SBASX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBASX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBASX has more cash in the bank: 107M vs. WCMLX (49.8M). SBASX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: SBASX (0.13) vs WCMLX (0.00). SBASX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: SBASX (7 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than SBASX (1.12). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. SBASX (40.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBASX: WCMLX (100000) vs SBASX (250000). SBASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.22 vs. WCMLX (10.02). SBASX return over 5 years is better than : 1.16 vs. WCMLX (-7.19).
| SBASX | WCMLX | SBASX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.79 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.399 | 6.904 | 238% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 100000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 107M | 49.8M | 215% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.22 | 10.02 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.14 | 22.79 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.16 | -7.19 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement