Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SBASX vs WCMNX
SBASX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts SBASX vs WCMNX
SBASX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SBASX vs. WCMNX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBASX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBASX has more cash in the bank: 107M vs. WCMNX (49.8M). SBASX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: SBASX (0.13) vs WCMNX (0.00). SBASX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: SBASX (7 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than SBASX (1.12). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. SBASX (40.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBASX: WCMNX (1000) vs SBASX (250000). SBASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.22 vs. WCMNX (9.79). SBASX return over 5 years is better than : 1.16 vs. WCMNX (-8.37).
| SBASX | WCMNX | SBASX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.24 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 2.04 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.399 | 6.716 | 244% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 107M | 49.8M | 215% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.22 | 9.79 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.14 | 21.92 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.16 | -8.37 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers