Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SBHCX vs WCMNX
SBHCX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts SBHCX vs WCMNX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Cre Ret
Price$12.55
Change+$0.06 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.13M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.96
Change+$0.07 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.26M
SBHCX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SBHCX vs. WCMNX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBHCX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBHCX has more cash in the bank: 94.1M vs. WCMNX (41.3M). SBHCX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: SBHCX (0.20) vs WCMNX (0.00). SBHCX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: SBHCX (6 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). SBHCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than WCMNX (2.04). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. SBHCX (40.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHCX: WCMNX (1000) vs SBHCX (2500). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.30 vs. SBHCX (-8.30). SBHCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.64 vs. WCMNX (-2.13).
| SBHCX | WCMNX | SBHCX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.24 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 2.04 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.399 | 1.576 | -25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.1M | 41.3M | 228% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.30 | -3.30 | 252% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.13 | 20.47 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.64 | -2.13 | -547% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement