Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SBHCX vs WCMNX
SBHCX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts SBHCX vs WCMNX
SBHCX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SBHCX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBHCX is a StrongBuy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBHCX has more cash in the bank: 110M vs. WCMNX (54.2M). SBHCX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: SBHCX (0.02) vs WCMNX (0.00). SBHCX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: SBHCX (7 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). SBHCX (2.87) is less costly to investors than WCMNX (2.04). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. SBHCX (40.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHCX: WCMNX (1000) vs SBHCX (2500). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.29 vs. SBHCX (18.66). SBHCX return over 5 years is better than : 7.75 vs. WCMNX (2.47).
| SBHCX | WCMNX | SBHCX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.24 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.87 | 2.04 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.065 | 13.358 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110M | 54.2M | 203% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.66 | 22.29 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.47 | 27.05 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.75 | 2.47 | 314% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement