Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SBPYX vs WCMLX
SBPYX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts SBPYX vs WCMLX
SBPYX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SBPYX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBPYX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBPYX has more cash in the bank: 1.95B vs. WCMLX (51.9M). SBPYX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . SBPYX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: SBPYX (22 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than SBPYX (0.91). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. SBPYX (20.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBPYX: WCMLX (100000) vs SBPYX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.02 vs. SBPYX (0.48). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 3.16 vs. SBPYX (-24.41).
| SBPYX | WCMLX | SBPYX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.99 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.79 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.652 | 11.410 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.95B | 51.9M | 3,750% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.48 | 17.02 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.72 | 32.50 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.41 | 3.16 | -772% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.81 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers