Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SBPYX vs WCMLX
SBPYX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts SBPYX vs WCMLX
SBPYX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SBPYX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBPYX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBPYX has more cash in the bank: 1.9B vs. WCMLX (47.2M). SBPYX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . SBPYX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: SBPYX (22 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than SBPYX (0.91). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. SBPYX (20.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBPYX: WCMLX (100000) vs SBPYX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.81 vs. SBPYX (-10.01). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. SBPYX (-31.40).
| SBPYX | WCMLX | SBPYX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.99 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.79 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.637 | 3.852 | 224% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.9B | 47.2M | 4,028% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.01 | 2.81 | -357% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.63 | 23.40 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.40 | -7.51 | 418% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement