Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Financial Conglomerates Industry is 259.4M. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 1 to 590.24B. IMAQU holds the highest valuation in this group at 590.24B. The lowest valued company is MDCE at 1.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Financial Conglomerates Industry was -0%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was 1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 3%. RDACU experienced the highest price growth at 39%, while RACC experienced the biggest fall at -46%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Financial Conglomerates Industry was 14%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was 1% and the average quarterly volume growth was -3%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 35

P/E Growth Rating: 88

Price Growth Rating: 56

SMR Rating: 96

Profit Risk Rating: 99

Seasonality Score: 1 (-100 ... +100)

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the group is 315.92M. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 276.7M to 355.15M. SOUL holds the highest valuation in this group at 355.15M. The lowest valued company is SBXD at 276.7M.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was 0%, and the average quarterly price growth was 2%. SBXD experienced the highest price growth at 0%, while SOUL experienced the biggest fall at 0%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 1,192%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 492% and the average quarterly volume growth was 2,871%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 80

P/E Growth Rating: 27

Price Growth Rating: 53

SMR Rating: 93

Profit Risk Rating: 100

Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)

SBXD vs. SOUL commentary

Sep 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBXD is a Hold and SOUL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement

COMPARISON

Comparison

Sep 06, 2026

Stock price -- (SBXD: $10.87 vs. SOUL: $10.46)

Brand notoriety: SBXD and SOUL are both not notable

Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry

Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBXD: 1% vs. SOUL: 215%

Market capitalization -- SBXD: $276.7M vs. SOUL: $355.15M

SBXD [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $276.7M. SOUL’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $355.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $259.4M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SOUL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBXD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

SOUL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
SBXD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.

According to our system of comparison, both SOUL and SBXD are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBXD’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOUL’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

SBXD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
SOUL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.

According to our system of comparison, SOUL is a better buy in the short-term than SBXD.

Price Growth

SBXD (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.18% price change this week, while SOUL (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.09% weekly)

SUMMARIES

FUNDAMENTALS

Fundamentals

SOUL($355M) has a higher market cap than SBXD($277M). SBXD has higher P/E ratio than SOUL: SBXD (52.00) vs SOUL (47.55). SOUL YTD gains are higher at: 3.054 vs. SBXD (2.741).

	SBXD	SOUL	SBXD / SOUL
Capitalization	277M	355M	78%
EBITDA	-3.29M	N/A	-
Gain YTD	2.741	3.054	90%
P/E Ratio	52.00	47.55	109%
Revenue	0	N/A	-
Total Cash	2.37K	N/A	-
Total Debt	N/A	N/A	-

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Technical Analysis

	SBXD	SOUL
RSI ODDS (%)	3 days ago 6%	N/A
Stochastic ODDS (%)	3 days ago 14%	N/A
Momentum ODDS (%)	3 days ago 13%	N/A
MACD ODDS (%)	N/A	N/A
TrendWeek ODDS (%)	3 days ago 20%	3 days ago 25%
TrendMonth ODDS (%)	3 days ago 19%	3 days ago 21%
Advances ODDS (%)	N/A	17 days ago 13%
Declines ODDS (%)	N/A	N/A
BollingerBands ODDS (%)	3 days ago 8%	N/A
Aroon ODDS (%)	N/A	3 days ago 14%

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

SBXD

Setup

Daily Signal:

Description

Gain/Loss:

SOUL

Setup

Daily Signal:

Description

Gain/Loss:

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
ASVDX	11.02	0.07	+0.64%
American Century Small Cap Value R6
MVCGX	31.03	-0.12	-0.39%
MFS Mid Cap Value R1
TGWTX	12.17	-0.06	-0.49%
Transamerica Large Growth I3
FNARX	71.56	-0.60	-0.83%
Fidelity Natural Resources Fund
HRLIX	11.19	-0.19	-1.67%
Hartford Real Asset I

SBXD and Stocks

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBXD has been closely correlated with FVN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBXD jumps, then FVN could also see price increases.

Ticker / NAME	Correlation To SBXD	1D Price Change %
SBXD	100%	N/A
FVN - SBXD	67% Closely correlated	+1.78%
FVNNU - SBXD	51% Loosely correlated	N/A
HCMAU - SBXD	36% Loosely correlated	+0.76%
TACHU - SBXD	33% Loosely correlated	+0.37%
NPACU - SBXD	31% Poorly correlated	N/A
More

SOUL and Stocks

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SOUL and FMAC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOUL and FMAC's prices will move in lockstep.

Ticker / NAME	Correlation To SOUL	1D Price Change %
SOUL	100%	N/A
FMAC - SOUL	24% Poorly correlated	+0.10%
INAC - SOUL	21% Poorly correlated	+0.49%
XRPN - SOUL	13% Poorly correlated	N/A
SBXD - SOUL	13% Poorly correlated	N/A
SZZL - SOUL	11% Poorly correlated	N/A
More