SCGLF
Price
$59.95
Change
-$5.22 (-8.01%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
47.12B
SEBC
Price
$24.48
Change
+$0.38 (+1.58%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
77.84M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCGLF vs SEBC

Header iconSCGLF vs SEBC Comparison
Open Charts SCGLF vs SEBCBanner chart's image
Societe Generale
Price$59.95
Change-$5.22 (-8.01%)
Volume$46
Capitalization47.12B
Southeastern Banking
Price$24.48
Change+$0.38 (+1.58%)
Volume$44.94K
Capitalization77.84M
SCGLF vs SEBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SCGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCGLF vs. SEBC commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCGLF is a Hold and SEBC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (SCGLF: $59.94 vs. SEBC: $24.48)
Brand notoriety: SCGLF and SEBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCGLF: 0% vs. SEBC: 1076%
Market capitalization -- SCGLF: $47.12B vs. SEBC: $77.84M
SCGLF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $47.12B. SEBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $77.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCGLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSEBC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SCGLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SEBC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SEBC is a better buy in the long-term than SCGLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCGLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCGLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SEBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SEBC is a better buy in the short-term than SCGLF.

Price Growth

SCGLF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -13.06% price change this week, while SEBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCGLF($47.1B) has a higher market cap than SEBC($77.8M). SCGLF has higher P/E ratio than SEBC: SCGLF (8.78) vs SEBC (7.56). SCGLF YTD gains are higher at: 117.302 vs. SEBC (-9.383). SEBC has less debt than SCGLF: SEBC (5M) vs SCGLF (173B). SCGLF has higher revenues than SEBC: SCGLF (54.2B) vs SEBC (29.7M).
SCGLFSEBCSCGLF / SEBC
Capitalization47.1B77.8M60,540%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD117.302-9.383-1,250%
P/E Ratio8.787.56116%
Revenue54.2B29.7M182,492%
Total CashN/A6.01M-
Total Debt173B5M3,460,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCGLF vs SEBC: Fundamental Ratings
SCGLF
SEBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9986
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2123
SMR RATING
1..100
550
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3953
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5833
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SEBC's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as SCGLF (56). This means that SEBC’s stock grew similarly to SCGLF’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as SEBC (23). This means that SCGLF’s stock grew similarly to SEBC’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SEBC (50). This means that SCGLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SEBC’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as SEBC (53). This means that SCGLF’s stock grew similarly to SEBC’s over the last 12 months.

SEBC's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as SCGLF (58). This means that SEBC’s stock grew similarly to SCGLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCGLFSEBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PUTKY31.300.32
+1.02%
PT United Tractors
AMADY84.430.46
+0.54%
Amadeus IT Group SA
WRDEF16.00N/A
N/A
Wereldhave NV
WHGOF0.39-0.01
-1.87%
White Gold Corp.
XTMIF0.03N/A
-3.79%
XTM Inc.

SCGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCGLF has been loosely correlated with KBCSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCGLF jumps, then KBCSY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCGLF
1D Price
Change %
SCGLF100%
N/A
KBCSY - SCGLF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.54%
PCLB - SCGLF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FVCB - SCGLF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
BNPQF - SCGLF
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.96%
BNPQY - SCGLF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
More

SEBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SEBC and PEBC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEBC and PEBC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEBC
1D Price
Change %
SEBC100%
+1.58%
PEBC - SEBC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKFL - SEBC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RWCB - SEBC
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFDL - SEBC
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCGLF - SEBC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More