SCHF
Price
$26.80
Change
-$1.05 (-3.77%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
66.42B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VEA
Price
$69.18
Change
-$2.66 (-3.70%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
317.3B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCHF vs VEA

Header iconSCHF vs VEA Comparison
Open Charts SCHF vs VEABanner chart's image
SCHF vs VEA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) vs. Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA)

Key Takeaways

  • Both SCHF and VEA offer low-cost exposure to developed markets outside the U.S. with identical 0.03% expense ratios, but VEA provides broader diversification through ~3,900 holdings including small-caps versus SCHF's ~1,500 large- and mid-cap focus.
  • SCHF tracks the FTSE Developed ex US Index, emphasizing large- and mid-caps, while VEA follows the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, incorporating small-caps for enhanced sector exposure and reduced concentration risk.
  • Top holdings overlap significantly, led by Samsung Electronics, ASML Holding, and SK hynix, reflecting strong technology and financials weighting in both funds.
  • Sector allocations are similar, with financial services (~23%) and industrials (~18-19%) dominating, though VEA offers slightly more balanced small-cap tilt.
  • VEA demonstrates higher liquidity with greater average daily volume, appealing for larger institutional trades, while both exhibit low turnover for tax efficiency.
  • In recent market cycles, performance has been closely aligned, with minor edges in volatility and returns varying by timeframe due to cap differences.

Introduction

Investors seeking diversified exposure to international developed markets often compare SCHF and VEA, two leading low-cost ETFs in the foreign large blend category. These funds compete directly by targeting equities outside the U.S., providing alternatives for portfolio diversification amid U.S. equity concentration risks. With strong capital flows into international equities in recent months—driven by a weakening dollar, attractive valuations, and sector rotation from U.S. tech—both ETFs offer compelling options for balancing global portfolios. Their structural similarities in costs and indexing make them relevant for long-term holders evaluating breadth of exposure versus liquidity and scale.

Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) Overview

The Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) is a passively managed fund seeking to track the FTSE Developed ex US Index (Net), comprising large- and mid-cap companies from developed markets excluding the U.S. It holds approximately 1,498 stocks, emphasizing broad market-cap weighted exposure across Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Canada. Top holdings include Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (2.40%), ASML Holding N.V. (1.95%), SK hynix Inc. (1.36%), Roche Holding AG (1.14%), and Novartis AG (1.11%), with the top 10 representing about 13% of assets. Sector allocations feature financial services (23.34%), industrials (19.00%), technology (13.05%), and healthcare (8.87%). The expense ratio is a competitive 0.03%, with low portfolio turnover of 4.98% supporting tax efficiency. SCHF's structure prioritizes liquidity (30-day median bid/ask spread of 0.04%) and precise index replication in the foreign large blend category.

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) Overview

The Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) passively tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, offering comprehensive exposure to large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks from developed markets outside the U.S., including Canada, Europe, and the Pacific region. With around 3,893 holdings, it provides superior diversification. Top holdings as of recent data feature ASML Holding NV (1.85%), Samsung Electronics Co Ltd (1.70%), SK hynix Inc (1.11%), Roche Holding AG (1.04%), and HSBC Holdings PLC (0.99%). Sector breakdown includes financials (23.74%), industrials (18.49%), consumer discretionary (10.30%), technology (9.72%), and health care (9.00%). The 0.03% expense ratio pairs with a minimal 2.9% turnover rate, enhancing cost efficiency and low tracking error. VEA's all-cap approach and high average daily volume (~20 million shares) underscore its robust liquidity profile.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Developed markets ex-U.S. equities face a dynamic environment shaped by macroeconomic shifts, including a weakening U.S. dollar, easing monetary policies in Europe and Japan, and robust capital inflows into international ETFs—reaching record levels in early 2026 with over $150 billion directed abroad amid sector rotation from U.S. mega-caps. Catalysts include AI supply chain growth benefiting Asian tech leaders like Samsung and SK hynix, Europe's infrastructure and defense spending resurgence, and Japan's corporate reforms. Risks encompass geopolitical tensions, varying interest rate trajectories, and commodity volatility impacting industrials and materials. Strong earnings cycles in financials and industrials, coupled with regulatory support for global trade, position these markets for relative resilience versus U.S. valuations trading at premiums.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, SCHF and VEA have exhibited closely aligned performance, with YTD returns around 5.3-5.4% and 1-year gains near 29%, reflecting synchronized responses to international momentum. Over 3-year periods, annualized returns hover at 17%, driven by sector rotation into financials and industrials amid dollar weakness and earnings growth in top holdings like ASML and Samsung. VEA's small-cap inclusion has occasionally buffered volatility in down markets, while SCHF's large-cap focus aligns with mid-cycle upswings. Both display comparable betas (~1.05) and volatility profiles, benefiting from low costs and diversification, though VEA's broader holdings enhance relative stability during geopolitical shifts and interest rate adjustments.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots scanning thousands of tickers across various timeframes, strategies like trend-following, mean reversion, and momentum, with performance metrics including win rates, profit factors, and drawdowns. Only the strongest, consistently outperforming bots earn a spot in this curated section, helping traders identify tools aligned with current volatility, sector rotations, and macro trends. Users can deploy these bots for automated trading or signals, tailoring to risk preferences. Explore the page to discover leading performers and integrate AI-driven insights into your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors VEA due to its superior diversification across ~3,900 holdings, including small-caps, which bolsters risk-adjusted positioning amid ongoing international inflows and sector rotations. While SCHF offers efficient large-cap exposure, VEA's broader profile, higher liquidity, and aligned cost structure provide a marginal edge in trend consistency and resilience to macro shifts, with probabilities tilting toward outperformance in diversified portfolios over coming cycles.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SCHF vs. VEA commentary
Jun 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHF is a Hold and VEA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEA has more net assets: 317B vs. SCHF (66.4B). SCHF has a higher annual dividend yield than VEA: SCHF (15.890) vs VEA (15.065). SCHF was incepted earlier than VEA: SCHF (17 years) vs VEA (19 years). SCHF (0.03) and VEA (0.03) have comparable expense ratios . SCHF (4.00) and VEA (4.00) have matching turnover.
SCHFVEASCHF / VEA
Gain YTD15.89015.065105%
Net Assets66.4B317B21%
Total Expense Ratio0.030.03100%
Turnover4.004.00100%
Yield2.952.61113%
Fund Existence17 years19 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCHFVEA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VEA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EIPX32.240.20
+0.62%
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF
SPD41.920.15
+0.36%
Simplify US Equity PLUS Dwnsd Cnvxty ETF
JMBS45.020.08
+0.18%
Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Sec ETF
CARD2.60-0.02
-0.79%
Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Lvrgd ETN
SSK9.32-0.38
-3.92%
REX-Osprey SOL + Staking ETF

SCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCHF
1D Price
Change %
SCHF100%
+0.29%
STM - SCHF
79%
Closely correlated
-1.69%
SAN - SCHF
72%
Closely correlated
+2.55%
MT - SCHF
71%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
FER - SCHF
68%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
BHP - SCHF
67%
Closely correlated
-2.28%
More

VEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VEA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VEA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VEA
1D Price
Change %
VEA100%
+0.24%
ASML - VEA
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.80%
SAP - VEA
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.58%
SHEL - VEA
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
MC - VEA
47%
Loosely correlated
+3.16%
AZN - VEA
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.13%