SCHF
Price
$26.88
Change
+$0.37 (+1.40%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Net Assets
63.39B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VXUS
Price
$83.75
Change
+$1.12 (+1.36%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Net Assets
582.27B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCHF vs VXUS

Header iconSCHF vs VXUS Comparison
Open Charts SCHF vs VXUSBanner chart's image
SCHF vs VXUS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) vs. Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS)

Key Takeaways

  • SCHF tracks the FTSE Developed ex US Index, providing exposure to approximately 1,500 large- and mid-cap stocks in developed markets outside the U.S., while VXUS follows the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index with over 8,600 holdings across both developed and emerging markets.
  • SCHF offers a lower expense ratio of 0.03% compared to VXUS at 0.05%, enhancing cost efficiency for long-term investors.
  • VXUS provides broader diversification through emerging market exposure (around 25-27%), introducing higher growth potential but increased volatility relative to SCHF's developed-market focus.
  • Both ETFs exhibit similar sector profiles, with financial services leading at about 23%, but VXUS has heavier technology weighting due to emerging market tech giants.
  • SCHF demonstrates lower turnover (around 5%) and higher liquidity, suiting investors prioritizing stability in developed economies.
  • Recent capital flows favor international ex-US ETFs amid sector rotation toward value and overseas growth opportunities.

Introduction

Comparing SCHF and VXUS is relevant for investors seeking international equity exposure amid shifting global capital flows and U.S. market concentration risks. Both ETFs target ex-U.S. stocks but differ structurally: SCHF focuses on developed markets for stability, while VXUS includes emerging markets for broader diversification. They appeal to similar goals of geographic balance in portfolios, yet SCHF suits conservative strategies emphasizing liquidity and low costs, whereas VXUS offers comprehensive coverage including high-growth regions like Asia. In the current environment of interest rate normalization and overseas earnings momentum, these funds provide alternatives for optimizing sector exposure and relative positioning in ETF comparisons.

Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) Overview

The Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) is a passively managed fund seeking to track the FTSE Developed ex US Index, comprising large- and mid-cap companies in developed markets outside the United States. It holds approximately 1,498 stocks, offering concentrated diversification across Europe, Japan, and other mature economies. Top holdings include Samsung Electronics (2.22%), ASML Holding NV (1.99%), and SK Hynix Inc. (1.29%), with no single position exceeding 2.5%. Sector allocations emphasize financial services (23.5%), industrials (19%), and technology (13%), reflecting developed market strengths in banking, manufacturing, and semiconductors. With an ultralow expense ratio of 0.03% and portfolio turnover around 5%, SCHF prioritizes cost efficiency and minimal trading. Its structure supports high liquidity, backed by substantial AUM exceeding $58 billion, making it ideal for core international allocations focused on structural stability rather than emerging growth.

Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) Overview

The Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) passively tracks the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index, delivering exposure to over 8,600 stocks across developed and emerging markets worldwide, excluding the U.S. This all-cap approach spans large-, mid-, and small-caps, with roughly 25-27% in emerging markets like Taiwan and China. Leading holdings feature Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (3.18%), ASML Holding NV (1.34%), and Samsung Electronics (1.23%), highlighting technology dominance. Sectors are led by financial services (23%), technology (15.6%), and industrials (16%), blending developed stability with emerging dynamism. The 0.05% expense ratio and low 4.4% turnover underscore its efficiency, while AUM surpassing $600 billion ensures robust liquidity. VXUS stands out for comprehensive global ex-U.S. coverage, suiting investors pursuing diversified fund performance across market cycles.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

International ex-U.S. equities navigate a landscape shaped by macroeconomic divergence, with developed markets buoyed by European fiscal stimulus and Japanese growth, while emerging regions benefit from AI-driven manufacturing and commodity rebounds. Recent capital flows into ex-U.S. ETFs—exceeding $50 billion in early 2026—reflect sector rotation from U.S. tech concentration toward value-oriented financials and industrials overseas. Geopolitical tensions and interest rate expectations favor diversified exposure, as non-U.S. earnings cycles strengthen amid a weaker dollar. Risks include currency volatility and regulatory shifts in emerging markets, yet macro tailwinds like AI supply chains position these ETFs favorably in broader portfolio strategies.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SCHF has shown relative resilience tied to developed market recoveries, outperforming in periods of risk aversion due to its focus on stable economies like Japan and Europe. VXUS, with emerging market tilt, exhibits higher volatility but captures upside from growth hubs, lagging in downturns yet leading during global expansions. Both have benefited from sector momentum in financials and tech, though SCHF's lower emerging exposure yields smoother relative positioning amid U.S. dollar fluctuations. Volatility differences stem from VXUS's broader cap spectrum, while shared top holdings like ASML foster correlation. Performance drivers include overseas earnings beats and rate cut expectations, enhancing their appeal in diversified ETF comparisons.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots scanning thousands of tickers across various timeframes, strategies like momentum, mean reversion, and scalping, with performance metrics including win rates, profit factors, and drawdowns. Only the strongest, real-time performers rise to this curated section, adapting dynamically to volatility, trends, and sector shifts. Investors can explore bots tailored to ETFs, stocks, or forex, often displaying recent returns ranging from 10-50% in tested periods. This resource empowers data-driven decisions; visit to identify bots aligning with your international equity focus.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SCHF with moderate conviction, citing its superior cost structure (0.03% expense ratio), developed-market stability, and consistent trend alignment amid recent ex-U.S. flows. While VXUS offers unmatched diversification, SCHF's lower risk exposure and liquidity edge it in the prevailing environment of macroeconomic uncertainty, potentially delivering stronger risk-adjusted positioning over coming cycles.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SCHF vs. VXUS commentary
Apr 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHF is a Hold and VXUS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VXUS has more net assets: 582B vs. SCHF (63.4B). SCHF has a higher annual dividend yield than VXUS: SCHF (11.814) vs VXUS (11.063). SCHF was incepted earlier than VXUS: SCHF (16 years) vs VXUS (15 years). SCHF (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than VXUS (0.05). SCHF (4.00) and VXUS (4.00) have matching turnover.
SCHFVXUSSCHF / VXUS
Gain YTD11.81411.063107%
Net Assets63.4B582B11%
Total Expense Ratio0.030.0560%
Turnover4.004.00100%
Yield3.402.99114%
Fund Existence16 years15 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCHFVXUS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VXUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VIOO125.132.51
+2.05%
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
LGHT9.020.14
+1.60%
Langar Global HealthTech ETF
GVIP166.062.04
+1.24%
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
RITPF29.00N/A
N/A
RIT Capital Partners Plc.
GLL18.73-0.49
-2.55%
ProShares UltraShort Gold

SCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCHF
1D Price
Change %
SCHF100%
+1.40%
STM - SCHF
79%
Closely correlated
+6.37%
SAN - SCHF
70%
Closely correlated
+4.72%
MT - SCHF
68%
Closely correlated
+3.81%
BNT - SCHF
67%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
BMO - SCHF
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
More