SCHG
Price
$35.31
Change
-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Net Assets
62.37B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPMO
Price
$147.52
Change
+$0.11 (+0.07%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Net Assets
21.8B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCHG vs SPMO

SCHG vs SPMO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) vs. Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF (SPMO)

Key Takeaways

  • Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) offers broad, passive exposure to approximately 197 large-cap U.S. growth stocks through a market-capitalization-weighted index, while Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF (SPMO) employs a factor-based momentum strategy limited to roughly 100 securities selected from the S&P 500.
  • SCHG maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.04% compared with SPMO’s 0.13%, providing a cost advantage for long-term buy-and-hold investors seeking diversified growth exposure.
  • Both ETFs concentrate holdings in technology and consumer discretionary sectors, yet SCHG delivers wider diversification across growth characteristics, whereas SPMO’s momentum screen can lead to higher turnover and more concentrated bets on recent outperformers.
  • SCHG follows a quarterly rebalancing schedule aligned with its underlying index, while SPMO’s semi-annual rebalancing reflects its momentum methodology, potentially introducing greater sensitivity to short-term price trends.
  • Investors comparing the two must weigh SCHG’s emphasis on established large-cap growth names against SPMO’s dynamic rotation toward stocks exhibiting strong recent price momentum within the S&P 500.
  • The structural differences position SCHG as a lower-cost core growth holding and SPMO as a tactical complement for those seeking momentum-driven alpha within large-cap equities.

Introduction

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF (SPMO) both target large-cap U.S. equities with growth characteristics, yet they employ distinct methodologies that appeal to different investor objectives. SCHG provides straightforward, low-cost tracking of a broad growth index, while SPMO applies a rules-based momentum filter to the S&P 500. These ETFs do not compete directly for identical mandates but offer investors complementary approaches to large-cap growth exposure within the same market segment, allowing portfolio construction choices based on cost, diversification, and factor preferences.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) Overview

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) seeks to track the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, which measures the performance of large-cap U.S. stocks selected for growth attributes such as higher revenue and earnings growth rates. The fund is passively managed and typically holds around 197 securities. Top holdings commonly include companies such as AAPL, NVDA, MSFT, AMZN, and GOOGL. Sector allocations emphasize technology and consumer discretionary, reflecting the growth orientation of the underlying index. The expense ratio stands at 0.04%. SCHG employs a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with quarterly rebalancing to maintain alignment with the index, delivering cost-efficient, diversified exposure to established large-cap growth companies.

Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF (SPMO) Overview

Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF (SPMO) is designed to track the S&P 500 Momentum Index, which selects approximately 100 stocks from the S&P 500 with the highest momentum scores based on recent price performance. The fund is passively managed and maintains a more concentrated portfolio of roughly 100 holdings. Top positions often feature momentum leaders within technology and other high-performing sectors. Sector exposure tends to tilt toward areas exhibiting strong recent trends. The expense ratio is 0.13%. SPMO follows a semi-annual rebalancing schedule tied to its momentum methodology, resulting in a dynamic allocation that rotates toward stocks demonstrating sustained price strength within the S&P 500.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the large-cap U.S. equity growth segment, heavily influenced by technology sector leadership and broader macroeconomic conditions. Key drivers include earnings growth among mega-cap technology companies, capital allocation trends favoring innovation-driven businesses, and investor sentiment toward growth factors. Regulatory developments around technology competition and interest rate expectations can affect valuations across growth stocks. Sector risks encompass concentration in a limited number of large issuers, potential shifts in monetary policy, and evolving competitive dynamics within technology and consumer discretionary industries. Capital flows into growth-oriented strategies have supported both passive index and momentum-based approaches during recent market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has delivered steady participation in large-cap growth rallies through its diversified holdings, benefiting from consistent exposure to established leaders. Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF (SPMO) has shown differentiated behavior during periods of strong momentum in select stocks, potentially capturing outsized gains when momentum trends persist but experiencing greater rotation effects during shifts in leadership. Relative positioning highlights SCHG’s broader diversification and lower volatility profile versus SPMO’s sensitivity to momentum reversals. Sector rotation favoring technology has supported both funds, while changes in interest rate expectations and earnings cycles of top holdings influence their relative performance. Investors evaluating positioning should consider SCHG’s cost efficiency alongside SPMO’s factor tilt when constructing portfolios for varying market regimes.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like SCHG and SPMO can leverage the platform’s analytical capabilities to refine their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a probabilistic edge to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) for most core allocation scenarios due to its materially lower expense ratio, broader diversification across nearly 200 holdings, and straightforward passive methodology. Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF (SPMO) may appeal in environments where momentum factor consistency is prioritized, though its higher cost and more concentrated profile introduce additional considerations around turnover and sector concentration. The choice ultimately depends on an investor’s preference for cost efficiency versus momentum exposure within large-cap growth strategies.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SCHG vs. SPMO commentary
Aug 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHG is a Buy and SPMO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 62.4B vs. SPMO (21.8B). SPMO has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: SPMO (24.174) vs SCHG (8.491). SCHG was incepted earlier than SPMO: SCHG (17 years) vs SPMO (11 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than SPMO (0.13). SPMO has a higher turnover SCHG (27.00) vs SCHG (27.00).
SCHGSPMOSCHG / SPMO
Gain YTD8.49124.17435%
Net Assets62.4B21.8B286%
Total Expense Ratio0.040.1331%
Turnover27.0044.0061%
Yield0.390.7353%
Fund Existence17 years11 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCHGSPMO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCHG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPMO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMCG98.370.45
+0.46%
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
LQDH92.840.11
+0.12%
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corp Bd ETF
ZAUG27.88-0.01
-0.04%
Innovator Equity Defined Prt ETF -1YrAug
FKU57.30-0.32
-0.55%
First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX® ETF
SNAG5.50-1.11
-16.75%
Leverage Shares 2X Long SNAP Daily ETF

SPMO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPMO has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPMO jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPMO
1D Price
Change %
SPMO100%
+0.07%
ETN - SPMO
72%
Closely correlated
+2.50%
GLW - SPMO
72%
Closely correlated
+3.82%
PWR - SPMO
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.14%
CMI - SPMO
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
GEV - SPMO
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
More