Ad is loading...
SCHM vs VFMV
SCHM vs VFMV Comparison
Open Charts SCHM vs VFMV
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$28.13
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
Volume$631
CapitalizationN/A
Vanguard US Minimum Volatility ETF
Price$122.43
Change+$0.14 (+0.11%)
Volume$485
CapitalizationN/A
SCHM vs VFMV Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCHM vs. VFMV commentary
Dec 26, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHM is a Hold and VFMV is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 11.4B vs. VFMV (153M). VFMV has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: VFMV (17.869) vs SCHM (15.029). SCHM was incepted earlier than VFMV: SCHM (14 years) vs VFMV (7 years). VFMV has a higher turnover SCHM (18.00) vs SCHM (18.00).
| SCHM | VFMV | SCHM / VFMV | |
| Gain YTD | 15.029 | 17.869 | 84% |
| Net Assets | 11.4B | 153M | 7,451% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 26.00 | 69% |
| Yield | 1.42 | 1.74 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SCHM | VFMV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.75% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.13% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
More | ||||
VFMV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VFMV has been loosely correlated with CLBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VFMV jumps, then CLBK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VFMV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VFMV | 100% | +0.69% | ||
| CLBK - VFMV | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| BLFY - VFMV | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| MSGS - VFMV | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| GPOR - VFMV | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.63% | ||
| CCCS - VFMV | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
More | ||||