Ad is loading...
SCHM vs VFMV
SCHM vs VFMV Comparison
Open Charts SCHM vs VFMV
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$26.43
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Volume$808.55K
Net Assets10.97B
Vanguard US Minimum Volatility ETF
Price$124.05
Change+$0.20 (+0.16%)
Volume$21.47K
Net Assets261.43M
SCHM vs VFMV Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCHM vs. VFMV commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHM is a Buy and VFMV is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 11B vs. VFMV (261M). VFMV has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: VFMV (3.352) vs SCHM (-4.346). SCHM was incepted earlier than VFMV: SCHM (14 years) vs VFMV (7 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than VFMV (0.13). VFMV has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| SCHM | VFMV | SCHM / VFMV | |
| Gain YTD | -4.346 | 3.352 | -130% |
| Net Assets | 11B | 261M | 4,215% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.13 | 31% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 39.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 1.52 | 1.53 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SCHM | VFMV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 12 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
More | ||||
VFMV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VFMV has been closely correlated with LIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VFMV jumps, then LIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VFMV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VFMV | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| LIN - VFMV | 78% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| MA - VFMV | 78% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| ADP - VFMV | 77% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| CTSH - VFMV | 71% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| CNA - VFMV | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||