Advertisement
SCHYF vs SJMHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHYF is a Hold and SJMHF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SCHYF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSJMHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SCHYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- SJMHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SCHYF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SJMHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SCHYF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SJMHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
SCHYF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SJMHF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +2.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -0.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.84%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-0.00% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| SCHYF | SJMHF | SCHYF / SJMHF | |
| Capitalization | 21.1B | 2.73B | 773% |
| EBITDA | 2.05B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.181 | 10.922 | -20% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.20 | 8460.39 | 0% |
| Revenue | 7.02B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 985M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 7.09B | N/A | - |
SCHYF | SJMHF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 94 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 33 Fair valued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 15 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SCHYF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SJMHF (99). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew significantly faster than SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.
SCHYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SJMHF (100). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.
SCHYF's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SJMHF (97). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew significantly faster than SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.
SCHYF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SJMHF (53). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.
SCHYF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as SJMHF (16). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.
| SCHYF | SJMHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 46% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 14 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 38% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 52% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SPYV | 54.82 | 0.19 | +0.35% |
| SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | |||
| GSSC | 75.02 | 0.19 | +0.25% |
| Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US SmCp Eq ETF | |||
| GGME | 64.56 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
| Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF | |||
| XNAV | 77.06 | N/A | N/A |
| FundX Aggressive ETF | |||
| SPTS | 29.33 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| SPDR® Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF | |||
SCHYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SCHYF and MCHVF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCHYF and MCHVF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHYF | 100% | -4.38% | ||
| MCHVF - SCHYF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GXYYY - SCHYF | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.59% | ||
| SCHYY - SCHYF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.99% | ||
| SJMHF - SCHYF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
| WYNMY - SCHYF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
More | ||||
SJMHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SJMHF has been loosely correlated with SJMHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SJMHF jumps, then SJMHY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SJMHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SJMHF | 100% | +0.68% | ||
| SJMHY - SJMHF | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| GXYYY - SJMHF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.59% | ||
| SCHYF - SJMHF | 23% Poorly correlated | -4.38% | ||
| MLCO - SJMHF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.66% | ||
| WYNN - SJMHF | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.15% | ||
More | ||||