SCHYF
Price
$2.36
Change
-$0.01 (-0.42%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
21.28B
SJMHF
Price
$0.43
Change
+$0.03 (+7.50%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.06B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCHYF vs SJMHF

Header iconSCHYF vs SJMHF Comparison
Open Charts SCHYF vs SJMHFBanner chart's image
Sands China
Price$2.36
Change-$0.01 (-0.42%)
Volume$100
Capitalization21.28B
SJM Holdings
Price$0.43
Change+$0.03 (+7.50%)
Volume$190
Capitalization3.06B
SCHYF vs SJMHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SCHYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SJMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCHYF vs. SJMHF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHYF is a Hold and SJMHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (SCHYF: $2.36 vs. SJMHF: $0.43)
Brand notoriety: SCHYF and SJMHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCHYF: 4% vs. SJMHF: 11%
Market capitalization -- SCHYF: $21.28B vs. SJMHF: $3.06B
SCHYF [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $21.28B. SJMHF’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $3.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $38.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCHYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSJMHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SCHYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SJMHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCHYF is a better buy in the long-term than SJMHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCHYF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SJMHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCHYF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SJMHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SJMHF is a better buy in the short-term than SCHYF.

Price Growth

SCHYF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -0.42% price change this week, while SJMHF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +9.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +3.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+3.76% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHYF($21.3B) has a higher market cap than SJMHF($3.06B). SJMHF has higher P/E ratio than SCHYF: SJMHF (8481.40) vs SCHYF (20.85). SJMHF YTD gains are higher at: 32.096 vs. SCHYF (-3.811).
SCHYFSJMHFSCHYF / SJMHF
Capitalization21.3B3.06B695%
EBITDA2.31BN/A-
Gain YTD-3.81132.096-12%
P/E Ratio20.858481.400%
Revenue7.19BN/A-
Total Cash1.79BN/A-
Total Debt8.15BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCHYF vs SJMHF: Fundamental Ratings
SCHYF
SJMHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9634
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
196
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4739
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1816
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCHYF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SJMHF (99). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.

SCHYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SJMHF (100). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.

SCHYF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SJMHF (96). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew significantly faster than SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.

SJMHF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYF (47). This means that SJMHF’s stock grew similarly to SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.

SJMHF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYF (18). This means that SJMHF’s stock grew similarly to SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCHYFSJMHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCHYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SJMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KIE59.060.16
+0.27%
SPDR® S&P Insurance ETF
QUAL189.350.29
+0.15%
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
OPP8.630.01
+0.12%
RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic Opportunity Fund
DVYA41.94-0.01
-0.01%
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
NBJP29.60-0.08
-0.28%
Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF

SCHYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCHYF and MCHVF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCHYF and MCHVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCHYF
1D Price
Change %
SCHYF100%
N/A
MCHVF - SCHYF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYYY - SCHYF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.55%
SCHYY - SCHYF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.61%
SJMHF - SCHYF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WYNMY - SCHYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.71%
More

SJMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SJMHF has been loosely correlated with SJMHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SJMHF jumps, then SJMHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SJMHF
1D Price
Change %
SJMHF100%
N/A
SJMHY - SJMHF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GXYYY - SJMHF
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.55%
SCHYF - SJMHF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLCO - SJMHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
WYNN - SJMHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.46%
More