Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCWCX vs TESGX
SCWCX vs TESGX Comparison
Open Charts SCWCX vs TESGX
SCWCX vs TESGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCWCX vs. TESGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCWCX is a Buy and TESGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWCX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. TESGX (790M). TESGX pays higher dividends than SCWCX: TESGX (0.57) vs SCWCX (0.12). SCWCX was incepted earlier than TESGX: SCWCX (26 years) vs TESGX (31 years). TESGX (2.08) is less costly to investors than SCWCX (1.77). SCWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. TESGX (15.75). SCWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TESGX: SCWCX (250) vs TESGX (1000). SCWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.14 vs. TESGX (2.23). SCWCX return over 5 years is better than : -15.08 vs. TESGX (-16.86).
| SCWCX | TESGX | SCWCX / TESGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 2.08 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 2.08 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.709 | 9.215 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.4B | 790M | 11,570% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.57 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.14 | 2.23 | 320% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.12 | 21.74 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.08 | -16.86 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.27 | 20.89 | 293% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement