Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCWCX vs TGSAX
SCWCX vs TGSAX Comparison
Open Charts SCWCX vs TGSAX
SCWCX vs TGSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCWCX vs. TGSAX commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCWCX is a Hold and TGSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWCX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. TGSAX (826M). TGSAX pays higher dividends than SCWCX: TGSAX (1.41) vs SCWCX (0.12). SCWCX was incepted earlier than TGSAX: SCWCX (25 years) vs TGSAX (30 years). SCWCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than TGSAX (1.09). SCWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. TGSAX (15.75). SCWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGSAX: SCWCX (250) vs TGSAX (100000). SCWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.60 vs. TGSAX (9.78). TGSAX return over 5 years is better than : -7.18 vs. SCWCX (-7.58).
| SCWCX | TGSAX | SCWCX / TGSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.09 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.09 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.483 | 14.211 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89B | 826M | 10,775% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 1.41 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.60 | 9.78 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.06 | 30.10 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.58 | -7.18 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.80 | 33.10 | 190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement