Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCWFX vs TEMGX
SCWFX vs TEMGX Comparison
Open Charts SCWFX vs TEMGX
SCWFX vs TEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCWFX vs. TEMGX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCWFX is a Hold and TEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. TEMGX (802M). TEMGX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: TEMGX (1.20) vs SCWFX (0.58). SCWFX was incepted earlier than TEMGX: SCWFX (25 years) vs TEMGX (45 years). TEMGX (1.34) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). SCWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. TEMGX (15.75). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEMGX: SCWFX (250) vs TEMGX (1000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.66 vs. TEMGX (10.03). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.17 vs. TEMGX (-12.95).
| SCWFX | TEMGX | SCWFX / TEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.34 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.34 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.314 | 10.211 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.3B | 802M | 11,758% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.20 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.66 | 10.03 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.26 | 18.64 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.17 | -12.95 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.75 | 29.83 | 267% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers