Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCWFX vs TEMGX
SCWFX vs TEMGX Comparison
Open Charts SCWFX vs TEMGX
SCWFX vs TEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCWFX vs. TEMGX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCWFX is a Buy and TEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. TEMGX (787M). TEMGX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: TEMGX (1.21) vs SCWFX (0.59). SCWFX was incepted earlier than TEMGX: SCWFX (25 years) vs TEMGX (45 years). TEMGX (1.34) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). SCWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. TEMGX (15.75). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEMGX: SCWFX (250) vs TEMGX (1000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.46 vs. TEMGX (9.06). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : -5.42 vs. TEMGX (-16.17).
| SCWFX | TEMGX | SCWFX / TEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.34 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.34 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.396 | 6.737 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.5B | 787M | 11,626% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 1.21 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.46 | 9.06 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.48 | 18.93 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.42 | -16.17 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.96 | 29.73 | 309% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers