SDS
Price
$55.03
Change
-$0.90 (-1.61%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
402.22M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SOXS
Price
$44.14
Change
-$2.60 (-5.56%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
1.5B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SDS vs SOXS

SDS vs SOXS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 03, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) vs. Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (SOXS)

Key Takeaways

  • SDS provides -2x daily inverse exposure to the broad S&P 500 Index, while SOXS delivers -3x daily inverse exposure to the narrower ICE Semiconductor Index, resulting in materially different risk and volatility profiles.
  • Both ETFs employ synthetic structures using swaps and derivatives rather than physical short positions, with daily rebalancing that can lead to compounding effects over longer holding periods.
  • SDS carries a net expense ratio of 0.91%, lower than SOXS at 1.00%, reflecting differences in leverage magnitude and underlying index complexity.
  • SDS offers broad large-cap equity inverse exposure suitable for general market hedging, whereas SOXS targets the concentrated semiconductor sector, amplifying sensitivity to technology-specific catalysts.
  • Structural characteristics position SDS as a moderate-leverage broad-market tool and SOXS as a higher-leverage sector-specific vehicle, with distinct liquidity and tracking behaviors in various market cycles.
  • Neither ETF is designed for long-term holding due to daily reset mechanics and the effects of volatility decay in trending markets.

Introduction

Investors seeking inverse equity exposure often compare leveraged products that serve tactical or hedging purposes. ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (SOXS) both provide daily inverse returns but differ in leverage, breadth, and sector focus. SDS targets the broad S&P 500, offering a moderate -2x multiplier for general market downturns. SOXS applies a more aggressive -3x multiplier to the semiconductor sector, addressing investors with specific views on technology supply chains and chip demand. These ETFs do not compete directly; instead, they represent alternative strategies for investors pursuing downside protection or bearish positioning within overlapping yet distinct market segments.

ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) Overview

ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to -2x the daily performance of the S&P 500 Index. The fund uses a synthetic structure primarily composed of swap agreements and other derivatives to achieve its objective. It maintains exposure equivalent to a broad basket of approximately 500 large-cap U.S. equities through these instruments rather than direct holdings. Top exposures typically involve swaps with major counterparties such as JPMorgan Chase, BNP Paribas, and UBS. The ETF carries a net expense ratio of 0.91% and distributes dividends quarterly. As a passive, leveraged inverse product, SDS resets daily and suits short-term tactical use rather than extended holding periods.

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (SOXS) Overview

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (SOXS) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of -3x the daily performance of the ICE Semiconductor Index. This index tracks approximately 30 of the largest U.S.-listed semiconductor companies by modified float-adjusted market capitalization. The fund achieves its target through swap agreements and derivatives, with top exposures including swaps on the index and cash equivalents for collateral. SOXS maintains a net expense ratio of 1.00% and distributes dividends quarterly. As a passive, leveraged inverse product focused on a single sector, it resets daily and exhibits higher volatility due to both the leverage factor and the concentrated nature of semiconductor equities.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The broader equity market and semiconductor sector continue to experience cycles driven by technological innovation, supply chain dynamics, capital expenditure trends among chipmakers, and macroeconomic factors such as interest rates and global demand. Semiconductors remain central to artificial intelligence, data centers, and consumer electronics, creating periodic volatility from earnings reports, inventory adjustments, and geopolitical tensions affecting manufacturing. Broader large-cap indices reflect diversified exposure across technology, financials, healthcare, and other sectors. Regulatory developments around export controls and domestic manufacturing incentives influence semiconductor flows, while interest rate expectations affect growth-sensitive equities across both the S&P 500 and chip-related names. These environments can create distinct opportunities for inverse products targeting either broad market declines or sector-specific corrections.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SDS has provided inverse exposure aligned with broad equity movements, with its -2x structure delivering moderated daily moves relative to higher-leverage alternatives. SOXS, with its -3x semiconductor focus, has exhibited amplified responses to sector-specific rotations, earnings surprises, and supply chain news. During periods of technology outperformance, SOXS has tended to experience sharper drawdowns than SDS due to both leverage and concentration. Conversely, broad market pullbacks without semiconductor-specific weakness have produced more balanced results for SDS. Relative positioning favors SDS for investors seeking diversified large-cap hedging and SOXS for those with targeted bearish views on chip demand or valuations. Volatility differences stem primarily from the underlying index breadth and leverage multiples, influencing suitability across varying risk tolerances.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing leveraged inverse products may use the tool to evaluate additional candidates aligned with their market outlook.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS). Its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across the S&P 500, and moderate -2x leverage provide a more balanced risk profile compared with the higher-cost, sector-concentrated -3x structure of Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (SOXS). While both serve distinct tactical roles, SDS demonstrates greater cost efficiency and index breadth, which may support more consistent positioning across varied market environments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SDS vs. SOXS commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SDS is a Hold and SOXS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOXS has more net assets: 1.5B vs. SDS (402M). SDS has a higher annual dividend yield than SOXS: SDS (-18.361) vs SOXS (-92.863). SDS was incepted earlier than SOXS: SDS (20 years) vs SOXS (17 years). SDS (0.91) has a lower expense ratio than SOXS (1.00). SDS (0.00) and SOXS (0.00) have matching turnover.
SDSSOXSSDS / SOXS
Gain YTD-18.361-92.86320%
Net Assets402M1.5B27%
Total Expense Ratio0.911.0091%
Turnover0.000.00-
Yield5.5546.2412%
Fund Existence20 years17 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SDSSOXS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
SDS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOXS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JLVMX23.760.21
+0.89%
JPMorgan Large Cap Value R6
TFOAX90.550.70
+0.78%
Touchstone Focused A
KCRIX8.680.06
+0.70%
Knights of Columbus Real Estt I
FFICX68.560.35
+0.51%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer F-3
SCYVX17.260.06
+0.35%
AB Small Cap Value Advisor