Advertisement
SECZ vs YMT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SECZ is a Buy and YMT is a Hold.
| SECZ | YMT | SECZ / YMT | |
| Capitalization | 1.35B | 1.06M | 126,999% |
| EBITDA | -52.15M | -40.68M | 128% |
| Gain YTD | -26.554 | -99.409 | 27% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 66.8M | 141M | 47% |
| Total Cash | 33.6M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
| SECZ | YMT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 49% | 10 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 17% | 2 days ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SECZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while YMT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SECZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- YMT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SECZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YMT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SECZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- YMT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
Price Growth
SECZ (@Packaged Software) experienced а +11.46% price change this week, while YMT (@Packaged Software) price change was +5.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
SECZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-4.16% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KOCT | 37.94 | 0.15 | +0.40% |
| Innovator US Small Cap Pwr Buff ETF™ Oct | |||
| GSCGX | 37.20 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity A | |||
| BEGIX | 18.56 | N/A | N/A |
| Sterling Capital Equity Income Instl | |||
| SOAEX | 14.43 | N/A | N/A |
| Spirit of America Energy A | |||
| TDTF | 23.02 | -0.11 | -0.48% |
| Northern Trust iBoxx 5-Yr TrgtDurTIPSETF | |||
SECZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SECZ and SCOR have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SECZ and SCOR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SECZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SECZ | 100% | +2.86% | ||
| SCOR - SECZ | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.20% | ||
| STRC - SECZ | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
| SSTI - SECZ | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.53% | ||
| PDFS - SECZ | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.29% | ||
| APPS - SECZ | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
More | ||||
YMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that YMT and RTB have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YMT and RTB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YMT | 100% | +1.82% | ||
| RTB - YMT | 11% Poorly correlated | -5.72% | ||
| YB - YMT | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.98% | ||
| STRD - YMT | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
| BULL - YMT | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
| SECZ - YMT | 0% Poorly correlated | +2.86% | ||
More | ||||