SEMI
Price
$37.89
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
39.77M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMH
Price
$560.42
Change
-$2.23 (-0.40%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
66.84B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SEMI vs SMH

SEMI vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI) vs. VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH)

Key Takeaways

  • Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI) is an actively managed fund with a 0.75% expense ratio, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is a passive index tracker with a lower 0.35% expense ratio.
  • SEMI concentrates on semiconductor and related technology companies with flexible stock selection, resulting in higher concentration in top holdings compared to SMH’s rules-based approach tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index.
  • Both ETFs provide targeted exposure to the semiconductor sector, but SEMI allows for broader technology allocations while SMH maintains a strict focus on 25 semiconductor production and equipment companies.
  • SMH offers greater liquidity and lower costs, making it suitable for investors seeking efficient, broad semiconductor market representation, whereas SEMI’s active strategy aims for potential outperformance through manager discretion.
  • Structural differences in management style, cost, and diversification create distinct risk-return profiles suited to varying investor preferences within the semiconductor theme.

Introduction

Investors seeking semiconductor exposure often compare Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) because both target the same high-growth industry but employ different strategies. SEMI uses active management to select semiconductor and technology companies, while SMH provides passive, index-based exposure to leading semiconductor firms. These ETFs serve as alternatives rather than direct competitors, appealing to investors with varying views on active versus passive approaches within the semiconductor sector.

Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI) Overview

Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that invests at least 80% of its assets in securities of semiconductor, semiconductor equipment, and related technology companies. The fund typically holds a concentrated portfolio with the top 10 holdings representing approximately 65.9% of assets. Key positions often include companies such as NVDA, AAPL, AVGO, and MU. Sector allocations are heavily weighted toward technology at over 80%, with smaller exposures to communication services and financial services. SEMI carries an expense ratio of 0.75% and employs discretionary stock selection rather than strict index replication, allowing the manager to adjust holdings based on fundamental analysis.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Overview

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is a passive exchange-traded fund that seeks to replicate the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index before fees and expenses. The index includes 25 US-listed companies involved in semiconductor production and equipment. SMH maintains a diversified yet concentrated structure within its mandate, typically featuring top holdings such as NVDA, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, AVGO, and AMD. The fund allocates nearly all assets to the technology sector with a strict semiconductor focus. SMH features an expense ratio of 0.35% and follows a rules-based rebalancing methodology tied to the underlying index, emphasizing liquidity and market capitalization within the semiconductor space.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The semiconductor industry continues to benefit from structural demand drivers including artificial intelligence adoption, advanced computing, electric vehicles, and 5G infrastructure expansion. Capital flows into the sector remain robust amid ongoing technological innovation and supply chain investments. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations and global trade dynamics influence capital allocation, while regulatory developments around export controls and technology leadership add complexity. Sector risks include cyclical inventory adjustments, geopolitical tensions affecting supply chains, and valuation sensitivity to growth expectations. Both ETFs operate within this environment, providing investors with tools to gain exposure to these long-term themes.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited strong correlation to semiconductor earnings growth and technology spending trends. SMH’s passive structure has delivered consistent exposure aligned with the broader semiconductor index, resulting in lower tracking error and cost drag. SEMI’s active approach introduces potential for differentiated returns through selective positioning but also carries higher expense impact and manager-specific risk. Relative positioning shows SMH offering tighter alignment with large-cap semiconductor leaders, while SEMI may tilt toward additional technology names outside pure semiconductor manufacturing. Volatility differences arise primarily from concentration levels and management style, with both funds sensitive to sector rotation and macroeconomic shifts affecting technology valuations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing ETFs such as Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) may find the tool useful for exploring related opportunities in the semiconductor sector.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of preference to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The lower expense ratio, transparent passive methodology, and focused index tracking provide cost efficiency and consistent sector exposure. While Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI) offers active flexibility, the higher cost and concentration introduce additional variables that may reduce relative appeal in a standardized evaluation framework emphasizing efficiency and diversification within the semiconductor theme.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SEMI vs. SMH commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SEMI is a StrongBuy and SMH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 66.8B vs. SEMI (39.8M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than SEMI: SMH (55.616) vs SEMI (23.704). SEMI was incepted earlier than SMH: SEMI (4 years) vs SMH (15 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than SEMI (0.75). SEMI has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
SEMISMHSEMI / SMH
Gain YTD23.70455.61643%
Net Assets39.8M66.8B0%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.35214%
Turnover65.0012.00542%
Yield3.740.201,830%
Fund Existence4 years15 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SEMISMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SEMI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSIE48.150.32
+0.67%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Intl Eq ETF
SPE13.380.06
+0.45%
Special Opportunities Fund
KNOV32.250.11
+0.34%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Nov
PTF102.36-0.60
-0.58%
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology MomtETF
EWV16.86-0.34
-2.00%
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan

SEMI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEMI has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEMI jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEMI
1D Price
Change %
SEMI100%
+0.01%
TSM - SEMI
81%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
AVGO - SEMI
72%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
TER - SEMI
69%
Closely correlated
-1.93%
STM - SEMI
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
MRVL - SEMI
64%
Loosely correlated
-5.57%
More

SMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMH
1D Price
Change %
SMH100%
-0.40%
LRCX - SMH
89%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
AMAT - SMH
86%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
KLAC - SMH
85%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
ASML - SMH
84%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
TSM - SMH
83%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
More