SENEA
Price
$86.49
Change
-$2.63 (-2.95%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
404.39M
UTZ
Price
$13.38
Change
-$0.33 (-2.41%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.5B
5 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SENEA vs UTZ

Header iconSENEA vs UTZ Comparison
Open Charts SENEA vs UTZBanner chart's image
Seneca Foods
Price$86.49
Change-$2.63 (-2.95%)
Volume$30.25K
Capitalization404.39M
Utz Brands
Price$13.38
Change-$0.33 (-2.41%)
Volume$860.87K
Capitalization1.5B
SENEA vs UTZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
SENEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SENEA vs. UTZ commentary
Apr 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SENEA is a Buy and UTZ is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 26, 2025
Stock price -- (SENEA: $86.49 vs. UTZ: $13.38)
Brand notoriety: SENEA and UTZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SENEA: 98% vs. UTZ: 68%
Market capitalization -- SENEA: $404.39M vs. UTZ: $1.5B
SENEA [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $404.39M. UTZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $1.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SENEA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SENEA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SENEA is a better buy in the long-term than UTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SENEA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UTZ’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SENEA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UTZ’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UTZ is a better buy in the short-term than SENEA.

Price Growth

SENEA (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +4.79% price change this week, while UTZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -2.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

SENEA is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

UTZ is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.39% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UTZ($1.5B) has a higher market cap than SENEA($404M). UTZ has higher P/E ratio than SENEA: UTZ (81.45) vs SENEA (7.41). SENEA YTD gains are higher at: 9.122 vs. UTZ (-14.119). SENEA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 145M vs. UTZ (99.2M). UTZ has more cash in the bank: 52M vs. SENEA (7.17M). SENEA has less debt than UTZ: SENEA (669M) vs UTZ (985M). SENEA (1.48B) and UTZ (1.44B) have equivalent revenues.
SENEAUTZSENEA / UTZ
Capitalization404M1.5B27%
EBITDA145M99.2M146%
Gain YTD9.122-14.119-65%
P/E Ratio7.4181.459%
Revenue1.48B1.44B103%
Total Cash7.17M52M14%
Total Debt669M985M68%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SENEA vs UTZ: Fundamental Ratings
SENEA
UTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6523
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2776
SMR RATING
1..100
8087
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
799
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UTZ's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as SENEA (75) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to SENEA’s over the last 12 months.

SENEA's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UTZ (76) in the null industry. This means that SENEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

SENEA's SMR Rating (80) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as UTZ (87) in the null industry. This means that SENEA’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

SENEA's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as UTZ (58) in the null industry. This means that SENEA’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

SENEA's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for UTZ (99) in the null industry. This means that SENEA’s stock grew significantly faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SENEAUTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SENEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APHGX24.010.05
+0.21%
Artisan Global Value Institutional
SFMIX36.090.02
+0.06%
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr R5
FACGX124.55N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opps C
RMOYX21.82N/A
N/A
Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Y
AUXIX30.36-0.05
-0.16%
Auxier Focus Institutional

SENEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SENEA has been loosely correlated with FLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SENEA jumps, then FLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SENEA
1D Price
Change %
SENEA100%
-2.95%
FLO - SENEA
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
UTZ - SENEA
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.41%
JBSS - SENEA
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
LANC - SENEA
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
JJSF - SENEA
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
More

UTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UTZ has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UTZ jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UTZ
1D Price
Change %
UTZ100%
-2.41%
KHC - UTZ
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
FLO - UTZ
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
CPB - UTZ
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
CAG - UTZ
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
GIS - UTZ
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
More