SGDJ
Price
$97.35
Change
+$0.73 (+0.76%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
367.73M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SIL
Price
$96.36
Change
+$0.16 (+0.17%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
5.12B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SGDJ vs SIL

SGDJ vs SIL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) vs. Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL)

Key Takeaways

  • Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) targets smaller-capitalization gold mining companies using a rules-based factor approach emphasizing revenue growth and price momentum, resulting in a more concentrated portfolio of approximately 30 holdings.
  • Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) provides broader exposure to silver mining firms globally, including larger producers and streaming companies, with around 40 holdings and a higher allocation to established players.
  • Expense ratios differ meaningfully, with SGDJ at 0.50% compared to SIL at 0.65%, offering a cost advantage for long-term holders of the junior gold strategy.
  • Both ETFs operate as passive, physically replicated vehicles focused on precious metals equity exposure, but SGDJ emphasizes junior gold miners while SIL centers on silver producers with varying degrees of gold co-production.
  • Structural differences in market capitalization focus lead to distinct risk profiles, with SGDJ exhibiting greater sensitivity to smaller-cap volatility and SIL benefiting from larger average constituent size.
  • Positioning in the current environment favors factor-driven selection in gold juniors for SGDJ versus diversified silver mining access in SIL, depending on investor views on metal-specific demand drivers.

Introduction

Investors seeking targeted exposure to precious metals equities often evaluate SGDJ and SIL as complementary yet differentiated options within the gold and silver mining sector. These exchange-traded funds do not compete directly but instead offer alternative strategies for accessing mining equities: one focused on junior gold companies and the other on silver producers. In an environment shaped by fluctuating metal prices, industrial silver demand, and macroeconomic factors, comparing their structures helps clarify relative positioning for portfolio allocation decisions.

Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) Overview

The Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) seeks to track the Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index through a passive, rules-based methodology. The index selects small-capitalization gold companies listed on regulated exchanges, primarily in Canada, Australia, and the United States, with weighting adjustments based on revenue growth for producers and price momentum for explorers. The fund typically holds around 30 securities and maintains a non-diversified structure concentrated in basic materials. Top holdings often include Centerra Gold Inc., Vault Minerals Ltd., Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd., Aris Mining Corp., and Fortuna Mining Corp. The expense ratio stands at 0.50%, with semi-annual index reconstitution supporting its factor emphasis.

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) Overview

The Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) aims to replicate the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index via a passive approach. The index covers global companies engaged in silver mining, exploration, and refining, resulting in approximately 40 holdings that span developed and emerging markets. Prominent positions frequently feature Wheaton Precious Metals Corp., Pan American Silver Corp., Coeur Mining Inc., Hecla Mining Co., and First Majestic Silver Corp. The fund carries an expense ratio of 0.65% and follows a non-diversified equity structure with primary allocation to basic materials. Rebalancing occurs periodically to align with index constituents.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The precious metals mining sector operates amid evolving macroeconomic conditions, including interest rate expectations, inflation hedging demand, and industrial applications for silver in solar energy and electronics. Gold mining activities respond primarily to bullion price movements and production costs, while silver miners face additional influences from supply constraints and downstream industrial consumption. Regulatory developments around mining permits and environmental standards, along with geopolitical factors affecting major producing regions, continue to shape capital flows and operational risks across both gold and silver equities.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, SGDJ has reflected heightened sensitivity to junior gold company dynamics, with performance influenced by smaller-capitalization volatility and factor-driven reweighting. In contrast, SIL has demonstrated behavior tied to broader silver producer trends, including larger-cap stability and exposure to streaming revenues. Relative positioning highlights SGDJ's potential for amplified responses during gold price upswings versus SIL's more balanced participation across silver and co-produced metals. Both vehicles exhibit elevated volatility compared to broad equity benchmarks, underscoring their role as tactical sector allocations rather than core holdings.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, SGDJ presents a modestly favorable profile for Tickeron’s AI considerations due to its lower expense ratio, factor-enhanced selection methodology, and focused exposure to junior gold miners. While SIL offers greater scale and silver-specific diversification, the cost efficiency and rules-based emphasis in SGDJ align with probabilistic preferences for long-term efficiency in precious metals equity strategies. Investors should evaluate both within the context of individual risk tolerance and sector outlook.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SGDJ vs. SIL commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SGDJ is a Hold and SIL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SIL has more net assets: 5.12B vs. SGDJ (368M). SGDJ (15.714) and SIL (15.533) have matching annual dividend yield . SGDJ was incepted earlier than SIL: SGDJ (11 years) vs SIL (16 years). SGDJ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than SIL (0.65). SGDJ has a higher turnover SIL (27.57) vs SIL (27.57).
SGDJSILSGDJ / SIL
Gain YTD15.71415.533101%
Net Assets368M5.12B7%
Total Expense Ratio0.500.6577%
Turnover76.0027.57276%
Yield7.121.04688%
Fund Existence11 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGDJSIL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
SGDJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SIL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TETH12.670.38
+3.09%
21shares Ethereum Staking ETF
AGEM50.010.66
+1.35%
abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Act ETF
SHNY9.310.10
+1.09%
MicroSectors™ Gold 3X Leveraged ETN
EPI42.290.29
+0.69%
WisdomTree India Earnings ETF
RGTX13.21N/A
N/A
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF

SGDJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGDJ has been closely correlated with EQX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SGDJ jumps, then EQX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGDJ
1D Price
Change %
SGDJ100%
+0.75%
EQX - SGDJ
85%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
DRD - SGDJ
85%
Closely correlated
+1.66%
SKE - SGDJ
85%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
SA - SGDJ
84%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
OGC - SGDJ
84%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
More

SIL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SIL has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SIL jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIL
1D Price
Change %
SIL100%
+0.17%
PAAS - SIL
95%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
WPM - SIL
94%
Closely correlated
+2.08%
CDE - SIL
91%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
OR - SIL
89%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
VZLA - SIL
82%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
More