SGDJ
Price
$76.48Alerts
Change
-$4.31 (-5.33%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Net Assets
344.29M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SIL
Price
$73.93Alerts
Change
-$0.70 (-0.94%)
Updated
Nov 13, 11:21 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
4.19B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SGDJ vs SIL

SGDJ vs SIL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Nov 07, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) vs. Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL)

Key Takeaways

  • SGDJ tracks junior, small-capitalization gold miners, offering high beta (sensitivity) to precious-metals prices but with elevated volatility and concentration in early-stage producers and developers.
  • SIL tracks global silver mining companies, including large-cap royalty and streaming firms, delivering broader diversification and significantly deeper liquidity.
  • The two funds do not compete directly: SGDJ is a niche junior gold-mining vehicle, while SIL is a broader silver-mining sector play with meaningful gold-byproduct exposure.
  • SGDJ carries a lower expense ratio (0.50%) than SIL (0.65%), a modest cost advantage for long-term holders.
  • Concentration risk is higher in SIL, whose largest holding represents roughly a quarter of assets, whereas SGDJ spreads risk across many smaller issuers.
  • Tickeron AI Verdict: SIL — the AI would favor SIL for its superior liquidity, established large-cap holdings, and more balanced risk-adjusted positioning in the current environment.

Introduction

Gold and silver miners have moved sharply into investor focus in recent market cycles as central-bank buying, persistent fiscal deficits, and shifting interest-rate expectations have supported precious metals. Within this space, the Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and the Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) are frequently compared — yet they represent different exposure profiles rather than direct substitutes. SGDJ targets small, early-stage gold developers with outsized leverage to metal prices, while SIL offers diversified access to established silver producers and royalty companies. Understanding their structural differences is essential for any investor weighing sector exposure and relative positioning in this thematic ETF comparison.

Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) Overview

SGDJ is a passively managed ETF that seeks to track the Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. The fund invests at least 90% of its net assets in securities comprising the index, which targets "junior" gold companies — generally small-capitalization miners and developers listed primarily in the U.S., Canada, and Australia. The index applies a factor tilt, weighting gold explorers by relative price momentum and gold developers by revenue growth.

The fund holds roughly 31 to 37 issuers, with its top holdings recently including Minerals 260 Ltd., Wesdome Gold Mines, West African Resources, Seabridge Gold (SA), Kingsgate Consolidated, Emerald Resources, DRDGOLD, and Allied Gold. Geographically, exposure skews toward Australia and Canada, with additional positions in Turkey, South Africa, and the United States. SGDJ carries an expense ratio of 0.50% and is structured as a non-diversified fund. Because it concentrates in juniors, it typically exhibits higher volatility and greater sensitivity to gold-price moves than large-cap miners.

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) Overview

SIL is a passively managed ETF that seeks to correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its assets in the index and in American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) and Global Depositary Receipts (GDRs), measuring the broad-based performance of global companies involved in silver mining.

The fund holds roughly 35 to 42 positions and is dominated by large, established names. Its top holdings include Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), a leading silver streaming company, along with Pan American Silver (PAAS), Coeur Mining (CDE), Hecla Mining (HL), Industrias Peñoles, First Majestic Silver (AG), SSR Mining (SSRM), Fresnillo, and Compañía de Minas Buenaventura (BVN). SIL carries an expense ratio of 0.65% and is non-diversified. Its market-cap-weighted structure produces meaningful single-name concentration, with the largest holding historically representing more than 20% of assets.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both funds operate in the precious-metals mining complex, which has been shaped by several durable macro forces. Elevated central-bank gold purchases, geopolitical uncertainty, and concerns about currency debasement have supported bullion demand, while silver benefits from dual roles as a monetary metal and an industrial input in solar, electronics, and electrification. Interest-rate expectations remain a key swing factor: lower real yields tend to reduce the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding metals. At the same time, miners face structural pressures from rising input costs, permitting delays, and jurisdictional risk in emerging markets. These dynamics support the sector broadly but affect juniors and established producers differently, with juniors more exposed to financing risk and large-cap royalty firms carrying steadier cash-flow profiles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, SIL has generally delivered strong absolute returns with comparatively lower single-stock volatility, aided by its weighting toward large-cap royalty and streaming companies that generate revenue without the full operational risks of mine ownership. SGDJ, by contrast, has exhibited a higher beta profile — junior miners can outperform dramatically during gold rallies but tend to underperform and suffer sharper drawdowns during corrections, given their dependence on external financing and project execution.

In terms of fund performance and relative positioning, SIL's depth of liquidity and mature holdings have supported more consistent trend behavior, while SGDJ's small-cap tilt creates greater dispersion and sensitivity to short-term sentiment. Investors seeking leveraged upside to gold may gravitate toward SGDJ; those prioritizing diversified, lower-volatility precious-metals exposure have historically favored SIL.

AI Screener

Tickeron's AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your own precious-metals and sector analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor SIL over SGDJ in the current environment. SIL's advantages include materially deeper liquidity, exposure to large-cap royalty and streaming businesses with more resilient cash flows, and a broader mix of silver and gold-byproduct revenue. While SGDJ offers a lower expense ratio and greater upside sensitivity to gold prices, its concentration in small-cap juniors introduces higher volatility, financing risk, and execution uncertainty. From a probabilistic, risk-adjusted standpoint, SIL's superior diversification profile, trend consistency, and sector momentum tilt the balance in its favor for most investors.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SGDJ vs. SIL commentary
Nov 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SGDJ is a Hold and SIL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for SGDJ with price predictions
Nov 12, 2026

SGDJ saw its Stochastic Oscillator peaks and leaves the overbought zone

The Stochastic Oscillator for SGDJ moved out of overbought territory on November 12, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock and investors may want to consider selling or taking a defensive position. A.I.dvisor looked at 61 similar instances where the indicator exited the overbought zone. In 55 of the 61 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 12, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on SGDJ as a result. In 71 of 81 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.

The 50-day moving average for SGDJ moved below the 200-day moving average on November 03, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SGDJ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.

SGDJ broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 09, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

The Aroon Indicator for SGDJ entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where SGDJ's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 23 of 25 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for SGDJ just turned positive on November 05, 2026. Looking at past instances where SGDJ's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 41 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 89%.

Following a +8.76% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SGDJ advanced for three days, in 305 of 337 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for SIL with price predictions
Nov 12, 2026

SIL saw its Stochastic Oscillator peaks and leaves the overbought zone

The Stochastic Oscillator for SIL moved out of overbought territory on November 12, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock and investors may want to consider selling or taking a defensive position. A.I.dvisor looked at 61 similar instances where the indicator exited the overbought zone. In 56 of the 61 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 12, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on SIL as a result. In 66 of 75 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.

The 50-day moving average for SIL moved below the 200-day moving average on October 26, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SIL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 86%.

SIL broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 09, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

The Aroon Indicator for SIL entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where SIL's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 23 of 26 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for SIL just turned positive on November 05, 2026. Looking at past instances where SIL's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 49 of 52 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

Following a +7.90% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SIL advanced for three days, in 292 of 317 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGDJSIL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement

SGDJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGDJ has been closely correlated with SKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SGDJ jumps, then SKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGDJ
1D Price
Change %
SGDJ100%
-5.33%
SKE - SGDJ
88%
Closely correlated
-5.20%
EQX - SGDJ
86%
Closely correlated
-4.26%
OGC - SGDJ
86%
Closely correlated
-1.87%
DRD - SGDJ
85%
Closely correlated
-2.30%
SA - SGDJ
84%
Closely correlated
-3.12%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HYGW27.88-0.07
-0.25%
iShares High Yield Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (HYGW)
LCAP33.32-0.12
-0.35%
Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP)
TBFG31.99-0.16
-0.49%
Brinsmere Fund Growth ETF (TBFG)
TSDD5.92-0.22
-3.58%
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD)
NIOG4.16-0.58
-12.15%
Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF (NIOG)