SGDM
Price
$82.82
Change
+$1.62 (+2.00%)
Updated
Sep 3, 11:40 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
696.81M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SLVP
Price
$41.30
Change
+$0.98 (+2.43%)
Updated
Sep 3, 12:18 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
978.32M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SGDM vs SLVP

SGDM vs SLVP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) vs. iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP)

Key Takeaways

  • SGDM tracks the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index with a rules-based, factor-weighted approach emphasizing revenue growth, free cash flow yield, and low debt-to-equity ratios, while SLVP follows the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index focused on companies deriving the majority of revenue from silver mining.
  • SGDM holds approximately 49-50 securities with broader exposure to gold miners primarily in Canada and the United States; SLVP maintains a more concentrated portfolio of 35-37 holdings skewed toward silver producers with notable allocations in Mexico and the United Kingdom.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed equity vehicles in the precious metals sector with similar sector allocations exceeding 99% to metals and mining, though SGDM incorporates explicit factor tilts and quarterly index reconstitution.
  • Expense ratios stand at 0.46% for SGDM and 0.39% for SLVP, reflecting modest cost differences that favor SLVP on an ongoing basis.
  • SGDM offers greater geographic concentration in North America with emphasis on larger gold-focused operators, whereas SLVP provides more global reach including emerging market silver names and higher single-stock concentration risk.
  • Structural distinctions position SGDM as a factor-enhanced gold miner vehicle and SLVP as a targeted silver and metals miner solution, creating differentiated risk-return profiles within the same broad precious metals theme.

Introduction

SGDM and SLVP represent two distinct approaches to precious metals equity exposure, both targeting mining companies but with differing commodity emphases and construction methodologies. SGDM provides factor-adjusted access to gold miners, while SLVP delivers concentrated silver mining exposure across developed and emerging markets. These ETFs do not compete directly as identical substitutes but serve as complementary or alternative vehicles for investors seeking sector-specific equity participation in gold and silver mining. In the current environment of commodity price volatility and macroeconomic uncertainty, comparing their structural features helps clarify positioning within precious metals strategies.

Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) Overview

SGDM seeks investment results that correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. The index applies a rules-based methodology that weights larger gold companies listed on major Canadian and U.S. exchanges according to factors including higher revenue growth, elevated free cash flow yield, and lower long-term debt-to-equity ratios. The ETF is passively managed and non-diversified, typically holding 49-50 securities with quarterly index reconstitution. Top holdings commonly include Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM), Barrick Mining Corporation, Newmont Corporation (NEM), Wheaton Precious Metals Corp (WPM), and Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV). Geographic exposure concentrates in Canada and the United States, with industry weightings dominated by gold mining. The expense ratio is 0.46%.

iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) Overview

SLVP seeks to track the investment results of the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, which targets global companies primarily engaged in silver mining or exploration. The fund is passively managed and non-diversified, generally investing at least 80% of assets in index components and substantially identical investments. It maintains approximately 35-37 holdings with a higher degree of concentration, where the top ten positions often exceed 70% of assets. Prominent holdings include Hecla Mining Company (HL), Industrias Penoles SAB de CV, First Majestic Silver Corp, Fresnillo PLC, and Aya Gold & Silver Inc. Geographic allocations span Canada, the United States, Mexico, and the United Kingdom. The expense ratio stands at 0.39%.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The precious metals mining sector operates within a macro environment shaped by gold and silver price movements, interest rate expectations, inflation dynamics, and geopolitical developments. Both ETFs benefit from broader capital flows into hard assets during periods of monetary easing or uncertainty, while facing risks from higher input costs, regulatory changes in mining jurisdictions, and operational challenges at individual properties. Silver mining exposure carries additional sensitivity to industrial demand drivers such as solar energy and electronics, creating a distinct demand profile relative to pure gold mining. Capital allocation trends and exploration spending patterns influence long-term supply dynamics across the sector.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SGDM and SLVP have exhibited differentiated behavior tied to underlying commodity trends and holding characteristics. SGDM’s factor tilts and larger-cap gold focus have supported relative stability during gold price advances, while SLVP’s silver-centric concentration has amplified moves linked to silver price volatility and industrial metal demand shifts. Both vehicles demonstrate elevated volatility typical of mining equities, with performance influenced by earnings cycles of key producers, sector rotation between precious and base metals, and broader risk sentiment. Relative positioning reflects SGDM’s emphasis on diversified gold operators versus SLVP’s leveraged exposure to silver-specific names.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into vehicles such as SGDM and SLVP may find the platform useful for refining their analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic edge to SLVP due to its lower expense ratio, targeted silver exposure that may align with certain industrial demand catalysts, and established liquidity profile. SGDM remains competitive through its factor-enhanced methodology and broader gold miner diversification, offering potential resilience in gold-dominant environments. Final selection depends on an investor’s specific commodity preference, risk tolerance, and portfolio construction objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SGDM vs. SLVP commentary
Sep 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SGDM is a StrongBuy and SLVP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLVP has more net assets: 978M vs. SGDM (697M). SLVP has a higher annual dividend yield than SGDM: SLVP (18.156) vs SGDM (16.616). SGDM was incepted earlier than SLVP: SGDM (12 years) vs SLVP (15 years). SLVP (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than SGDM (0.46). SLVP has a higher turnover SGDM (59.00) vs SGDM (59.00).
SGDMSLVPSGDM / SLVP
Gain YTD16.61618.15692%
Net Assets697M978M71%
Total Expense Ratio0.460.39118%
Turnover59.0074.0080%
Yield0.891.7750%
Fund Existence12 years15 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGDMSLVP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SGDM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLVP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFFCX62.940.92
+1.48%
Davis Financial C
SEQUX209.140.71
+0.34%
Sequoia
VMGAX884.12N/A
N/A
Vanguard MStar Mega Cap Growth Idx Instl
SCETX8.72N/A
N/A
Virtus Ceredex Small-Cap Value Eq I
VSRDX19.66N/A
N/A
VALIC Company I U.S. Socially Rspnb