SHALF vs SHCO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHALF is a Hold and SHCO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SHALF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHCO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- SHALF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SHCO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SHALF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHCO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SHALF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SHCO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
SHALF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SHCO (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -1.70% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.87%.
Reported Earning Dates
SHCO is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-1.23% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| SHALF | SHCO | SHALF / SHCO | |
| Capitalization | 3.03B | 1.11B | 273% |
| EBITDA | 41.8M | 89.3M | 47% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 1.074 | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.46B | 1.14B | 129% |
| Total Cash | 780M | 163M | 479% |
| Total Debt | 6.18B | 2.31B | 267% |
SHALF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| SHALF | SHCO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 41% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 39% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 33% | 12 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 28% | 12 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 18 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
SHALF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SHALF and WTBDY have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHALF and WTBDY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHALF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHALF | 100% | N/A | ||
| WTBDY - SHALF | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
| SKTP - SHALF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SHCO - SHALF | 1% Poorly correlated | -1.44% | ||
| PRSI - SHALF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MNRIF - SHALF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SHCO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SHCO and HKSHF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHCO and HKSHF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHCO | 100% | -1.44% | ||
| HKSHF - SHCO | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| H - SHCO | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.66% | ||
| MAR - SHCO | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.43% | ||
| HLT - SHCO | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
| ACCYY - SHCO | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.82% | ||
More | ||||