SHLD
Price
$64.11
Change
-$1.37 (-2.09%)
Updated
Sep 1 closing price
Net Assets
7.24B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XAR
Price
$252.07
Change
-$4.45 (-1.73%)
Updated
Sep 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
5.97B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHLD vs XAR

SHLD vs XAR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) vs. SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR)

Key Takeaways

  • Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) targets a broader defense technology theme, including cybersecurity, artificial intelligence (AI), and advanced hardware, while SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) focuses strictly on the aerospace and defense industry segment.
  • SHLD holds 50 securities with a market-capitalization-weighted approach and a 0.50% expense ratio; XAR uses a modified equal-weighted methodology across approximately 43 holdings and carries a lower 0.35% expense ratio.
  • Both ETFs provide passive exposure to defense-related equities, yet SHLD incorporates more technology-oriented names such as Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR), whereas XAR emphasizes traditional aerospace contractors with balanced large-, mid-, and small-cap representation.
  • Structural differences create distinct risk profiles: SHLD offers thematic diversification into disruptive technologies, while XAR delivers more concentrated industry exposure with potential for lower concentration risk due to equal weighting.
  • In the current market environment, both funds align with sustained defense spending trends, but investors should weigh cost efficiency against thematic breadth when evaluating relative positioning.
  • Liquidity remains strong for both, supported by primary listings on major U.S. exchanges and institutional participation in the defense sector.

Introduction

Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) represent two distinct approaches to defense-sector exposure. SHLD pursues a thematic strategy centered on defense technology applications, while XAR tracks a traditional aerospace and defense industry index. These ETFs do not compete directly but offer investors alternative pathways to capitalize on similar long-term catalysts such as rising global defense budgets. The comparison highlights structural differences that influence diversification, costs, and sector positioning within the broader industrials and technology landscape.

Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) Overview

Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) seeks to track the Global X Defense Tech Index. The fund employs a passive, market-capitalization-weighted strategy and holds 50 securities. Top holdings typically include RTX Corp (RTX), General Dynamics Corp (GD), Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT), Northrop Grumman Corp (NOC), and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Sector allocations concentrate heavily in industrials, with meaningful exposure to technology through cybersecurity and AI-related companies. The expense ratio stands at 0.50%. Launched in September 2023, SHLD provides thematic exposure to companies involved in defense hardware, advanced military systems, and related technologies. Rebalancing occurs periodically to maintain index alignment, supporting consistent exposure to the evolving defense tech landscape.

SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) Overview

SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) tracks the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index through a modified equal-weighted methodology. The fund holds approximately 43 securities and maintains a passive structure. Top holdings generally feature BWX Technologies Inc. (BWXT), General Dynamics Corp (GD), Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT), Curtiss-Wright Corp (CW), and Carpenter Technology Corp (CRS). The portfolio spans aerospace and defense sub-industries with balanced representation across large-, mid-, and small-capitalization stocks. The expense ratio is 0.35%. Established in 2011, XAR offers targeted industry exposure without broader technology overlays. Periodic rebalancing supports the equal-weighted design, which can reduce concentration in the largest names relative to cap-weighted peers.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the aerospace and defense sector, supported by sustained increases in global defense spending driven by geopolitical tensions and modernization programs. Macroeconomic factors such as government budget allocations and supply-chain resilience remain key influences. Regulatory developments around export controls and technology sharing continue to shape industry dynamics. Capital flows into defense-related equities have remained resilient across recent market cycles, reflecting the sector’s defensive characteristics amid broader economic uncertainty. Risks include potential shifts in fiscal priorities, supply-chain disruptions, and evolving international alliances that could affect contract awards and revenue visibility for constituent companies.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SHLD’s inclusion of technology-oriented holdings has contributed to distinct volatility patterns compared with XAR’s more traditional aerospace and defense focus. XAR’s equal-weighted approach has historically moderated concentration risk, leading to different relative performance during periods of sector rotation. Both funds have benefited from steady defense spending trends, yet SHLD’s thematic tilt introduces additional sensitivity to AI and cybersecurity developments. Interest-rate expectations and commodity trends influence input costs for manufacturers held in each portfolio. Investors evaluating relative positioning should consider how SHLD’s broader technology exposure versus XAR’s industry purity aligns with their views on defense-sector evolution over medium-term horizons.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs such as SHLD and XAR may find the platform useful for refining their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would likely favor SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) at present due to its lower expense ratio, established track record since 2011, and modified equal-weighted structure that supports broader diversification within the aerospace and defense segment. While Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) offers compelling thematic expansion into defense technology, XAR’s cost efficiency and industry-specific focus align with observable factors such as structural strength and consistent sector momentum. This assessment remains probabilistic and does not constitute investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SHLD vs. XAR commentary
Sep 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHLD is a Hold and XAR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHLD has more net assets: 7.24B vs. XAR (5.97B). XAR has a higher annual dividend yield than SHLD: XAR (6.403) vs SHLD (-0.732). SHLD was incepted earlier than XAR: SHLD (3 years) vs XAR (15 years). XAR (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than SHLD (0.50). XAR has a higher turnover SHLD (32.79) vs SHLD (32.79).
SHLDXARSHLD / XAR
Gain YTD-0.7326.403-11%
Net Assets7.24B5.97B121%
Total Expense Ratio0.500.35143%
Turnover32.7935.0094%
Yield0.650.31212%
Fund Existence3 years15 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHLDXAR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%