SHLD
Price
$62.24
Change
-$0.94 (-1.49%)
Updated
Sep 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
7.14B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XAR
Price
$241.48
Change
-$2.07 (-0.85%)
Updated
Sep 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
6.1B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHLD vs XAR

SHLD vs XAR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) vs. SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR)

Key Takeaways

  • SHLD and XAR both target the aerospace and defense sector but differ in strategy: SHLD emphasizes defense technology including artificial intelligence (AI) and cybersecurity, while XAR focuses on traditional aerospace and defense companies through modified equal weighting.
  • SHLD holds approximately 50 securities with a higher expense ratio of 0.50%, featuring concentrated exposure to large-cap names like Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and RTX Corp. (RTX); XAR maintains about 48 holdings at a lower 0.35% expense ratio with more balanced weights across large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks.
  • Sector allocation in SHLD includes roughly 89% industrials and 11% information technology, providing broader defense tech exposure; XAR allocates nearly 100% to industrials within the aerospace and defense sub-industry.
  • SHLD offers global diversification with notable non-U.S. holdings, whereas XAR remains predominantly U.S.-focused, potentially resulting in different volatility profiles during geopolitical or macroeconomic shifts.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed and track proprietary or select-industry indexes, positioning them as complementary rather than direct competitors for investors seeking sector exposure.
  • Cost efficiency favors XAR, while thematic breadth in emerging defense technologies supports SHLD for investors prioritizing innovation-driven growth.

Introduction

Global defense spending continues to influence capital allocation across the aerospace and defense sector, making targeted exchange-traded funds (ETFs) increasingly relevant for portfolio construction. The Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) and the SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) provide distinct avenues for exposure within this theme. They do not compete directly but instead offer alternative strategies—one centered on defense technology innovation and the other on established aerospace and defense industry participants—allowing investors to align selections with specific risk, diversification, and growth objectives.

Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) Overview

The Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) seeks to track the Global X Defense Tech Index. It invests in companies positioned to benefit from defense technology adoption, encompassing cybersecurity systems, artificial intelligence, big data, and advanced military hardware such as robotics and aircraft. The fund maintains approximately 50 holdings and carries an expense ratio of 0.50%. Top positions typically include Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR), RTX Corp. (RTX), General Dynamics Corp. (GD), Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT), and Northrop Grumman Corp. (NOC). Sector exposure centers on industrials at about 89% with information technology comprising roughly 11%. As a passive, thematic, cap-weighted product, it delivers global reach with significant U.S. weighting alongside international defense technology firms.

SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) Overview

The SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) tracks the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. It provides exposure to companies in the aerospace and defense segment of the S&P Total Market Index through a modified equal-weighted methodology that balances large-, mid-, and small-capitalization stocks. The fund holds approximately 48 securities and features a lower expense ratio of 0.35%. Holdings are more evenly distributed, with top positions often around 3% each, including names such as Axon Enterprise Inc. (AXON), VSE Corp. (VSEC), RTX Corp. (RTX), and General Dynamics Corp. (GD). Nearly all assets reside in the industrials sector, with strong U.S. concentration. This passive approach supports targeted industry access without heavy concentration in any single issuer.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The aerospace and defense sector benefits from sustained government budgets and technological advancement amid evolving geopolitical dynamics. Key drivers include modernization of military systems, integration of artificial intelligence and cybersecurity solutions, and supply-chain resilience for commercial aerospace. Regulatory support for domestic manufacturing and export controls shapes capital flows, while interest rate environments and commodity costs influence profitability across the value chain. Risks encompass policy shifts in defense appropriations, supply disruptions, and competition from non-traditional entrants in emerging technologies. Both ETFs operate within this framework, though their differing emphases on tech innovation versus traditional hardware create varied sensitivities to these macro and sector-specific factors.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, the two ETFs have exhibited distinct behaviors tied to their structural profiles. SHLD's emphasis on defense technology has aligned it with periods of heightened focus on digital capabilities and innovation spending, potentially amplifying returns during technology-driven rallies while introducing volatility from growth-oriented holdings. XAR's modified equal weighting and broader inclusion of mid- and small-cap aerospace names have supported more balanced participation across the industry, often resulting in lower concentration risk and steadier exposure during traditional defense procurement cycles. Relative positioning reflects trade-offs between concentrated thematic bets and diversified industry representation, with performance differentials arising from sector rotation patterns, earnings momentum in top holdings, and shifts in investor preference between pure-play defense contractors and technology-enabled solutions providers.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to XAR due to its lower expense ratio, more balanced diversification across capitalization tiers, and established track record within the core aerospace and defense segment. SHLD remains compelling for investors seeking incremental exposure to defense technology themes, particularly where innovation and global reach align with portfolio goals. Selection ultimately depends on individual risk tolerance and thematic priorities rather than a definitive ranking.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SHLD vs. XAR commentary
Sep 22, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHLD is a StrongBuy and XAR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHLD has more net assets: 7.14B vs. XAR (6.1B). XAR has a higher annual dividend yield than SHLD: XAR (1.023) vs SHLD (-2.172). SHLD was incepted earlier than XAR: SHLD (3 years) vs XAR (15 years). XAR (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than SHLD (0.50). XAR (33.00) and SHLD (32.79) have matching turnover.
SHLDXARSHLD / XAR
Gain YTD-2.1721.023-212%
Net Assets7.14B6.1B117%
Total Expense Ratio0.500.35143%
Turnover32.7933.0099%
Yield0.650.31205%
Fund Existence3 years15 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHLDXAR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
SHLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XAR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLTA20.691.25
+6.41%
ProShares Ultra PLTR (PLTA)
VCV9.660.01
+0.10%
INVESCO CALIFORNIA VALUE MUNI Income TRUST
GSEE69.01N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE)
TFFI21.43-0.14
-0.63%
Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF
MLPA55.85-0.64
-1.13%
Global X MLP ETF (MLPA)

SHLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHLD has been loosely correlated with KRMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHLD jumps, then KRMN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHLD
1D Price
Change %
SHLD100%
+0.80%
KRMN - SHLD
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
NOC - SHLD
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
LHX - SHLD
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
GD - SHLD
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
LMT - SHLD
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
More

XAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XAR has been closely correlated with CW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XAR jumps, then CW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XAR
1D Price
Change %
XAR100%
+1.54%
CW - XAR
76%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
BWXT - XAR
74%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
KRMN - XAR
71%
Closely correlated
-1.51%
AIR - XAR
70%
Closely correlated
+3.09%
HEI - XAR
68%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
More