Ad is loading...
SHOC vs SMH
SHOC vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts SHOC vs SMH
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
Price$47.03
Change+$1.17 (+2.55%)
Volume$257
Net Assets77.13M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$250.31
Change+$5.13 (+2.09%)
Volume$2.71K
Net Assets22.88B
SHOC vs SMH Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SHOC vs. SMH commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHOC is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 22.9B vs. SHOC (77.1M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than SHOC: SMH (1.239) vs SHOC (-0.109). SHOC was incepted earlier than SMH: SHOC (2 years) vs SMH (13 years). SMH has a higher turnover SHOC (10.00) vs SHOC (10.00).
| SHOC | SMH | SHOC / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | -0.109 | 1.239 | -9% |
| Net Assets | 77.1M | 22.9B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 10.00 | 18.00 | 56% |
| Yield | 0.56 | 0.46 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SHOC | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 86% | 26 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SHOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOC has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOC jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOC | 100% | +2.27% | ||
| KLAC - SHOC | 86% Closely correlated | +4.13% | ||
| LRCX - SHOC | 86% Closely correlated | +7.43% | ||
| AMAT - SHOC | 84% Closely correlated | +3.67% | ||
| ASML - SHOC | 82% Closely correlated | +3.42% | ||
| MKSI - SHOC | 78% Closely correlated | +4.18% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +2.35% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 90% Closely correlated | +4.13% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | +3.67% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +7.43% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +3.42% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +2.88% | ||
More | ||||