Ad is loading...
SHOC vs SMH
SHOC vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts SHOC vs SMH
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
Price$41.78
Change+$0.07 (+0.17%)
Volume$120
Net Assets71.7M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$219.55
Change-$0.97 (-0.44%)
Volume$23.13K
Net Assets20.1B
SHOC vs SMH Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SHOC vs. SMH commentary
Mar 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHOC is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 20.1B vs. SHOC (71.7M). SMH (-8.940) and SHOC (-9.148) have matching annual dividend yield . SHOC was incepted earlier than SMH: SHOC (2 years) vs SMH (13 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than SHOC (0.40). SHOC has a higher turnover SMH (18.00) vs SMH (18.00).
| SHOC | SMH | SHOC / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | -9.148 | -8.940 | 102% |
| Net Assets | 71.7M | 20.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.35 | 114% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 18.00 | 161% |
| Yield | 0.36 | 0.46 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SHOC | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 9 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SHOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOC has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOC jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOC | 100% | +2.96% | ||
| KLAC - SHOC | 86% Closely correlated | +2.43% | ||
| LRCX - SHOC | 86% Closely correlated | +4.40% | ||
| AMAT - SHOC | 84% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| ASML - SHOC | 82% Closely correlated | +1.91% | ||
| MKSI - SHOC | 78% Closely correlated | +2.70% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +2.94% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 90% Closely correlated | +2.43% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +4.40% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +1.91% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +3.63% | ||
More | ||||