Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SHOC vs SMH
SHOC vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts SHOC vs SMH
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
Price$62.11
Change-$3.24 (-4.96%)
Volume$32.67K
Net Assets129.8M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$324.28
Change-$0.82 (-0.25%)
Volume$67.62K
Net Assets35.52B
SHOC vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SHOC vs. SMH commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHOC is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 35.5B vs. SHOC (130M). SHOC (35.620) and SMH (34.245) have matching annual dividend yield . SHOC was incepted earlier than SMH: SHOC (3 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than SHOC (0.40). SHOC has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| SHOC | SMH | SHOC / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 35.620 | 34.245 | 104% |
| Net Assets | 130M | 35.5B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.35 | 114% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 15.00 | 167% |
| Yield | 0.24 | 0.30 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SHOC | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 88% | 24 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EVTR | 51.60 | 0.07 | +0.14% |
| Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF | |||
| CDEI | 80.19 | N/A | N/A |
| Calvert US Large-Cp Div, Eq AndIncETF | |||
| NJNK | 20.10 | -0.02 | -0.12% |
| Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF | |||
| QSPT | 30.49 | -0.36 | -1.17% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100® Buffer ETF Sep | |||
| EMXF | 45.45 | -0.61 | -1.33% |
| iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF | |||
SHOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOC | 100% | -4.96% | ||
| LRCX - SHOC | 87% Closely correlated | -6.19% | ||
| KLAC - SHOC | 87% Closely correlated | -5.57% | ||
| NVDA - SHOC | 86% Closely correlated | -3.15% | ||
| MKSI - SHOC | 82% Closely correlated | -3.73% | ||
| AMAT - SHOC | 81% Closely correlated | -6.15% | ||
More | ||||