Ad is loading...
SHOC vs SMH
SHOC vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts SHOC vs SMH
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
Price$37.58
Change+$1.30 (+3.58%)
Volume$27.68K
Net Assets63.49M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$198.91
Change+$7.01 (+3.65%)
Volume$11.5M
Net Assets17.7B
SHOC vs SMH Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SHOC vs. SMH commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHOC is a Hold and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 17.7B vs. SHOC (63.5M). SMH (-17.863) and SHOC (-18.085) have matching annual dividend yield . SHOC was incepted earlier than SMH: SHOC (3 years) vs SMH (13 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than SHOC (0.40). SHOC has a higher turnover SMH (18.00) vs SMH (18.00).
| SHOC | SMH | SHOC / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | -18.085 | -17.863 | 101% |
| Net Assets | 63.5M | 17.7B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.35 | 114% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 18.00 | 161% |
| Yield | 0.33 | 0.51 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SHOC | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SHOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOC has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOC jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOC | 100% | +3.57% | ||
| KLAC - SHOC | 86% Closely correlated | +3.26% | ||
| LRCX - SHOC | 86% Closely correlated | +5.12% | ||
| AMAT - SHOC | 84% Closely correlated | +3.82% | ||
| ASML - SHOC | 82% Closely correlated | +3.02% | ||
| ARM - SHOC | 80% Closely correlated | +4.58% | ||
More | ||||