SHOC
Price
$100.56
Change
+$7.37 (+7.91%)
Updated
Jul 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
208.46M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMH
Price
$538.90
Change
+$34.68 (+6.88%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Net Assets
62.38B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHOC vs SMH

SHOC vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 28, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) vs. VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH)

Key Takeaways

  • Both ETFs provide concentrated exposure to the semiconductor sector through passive index strategies, but differ in index construction, with SHOC tracking approximately 30 holdings and SMH tracking 25 holdings.
  • SHOC maintains a stricter focus on U.S.-listed semiconductor companies, while SMH includes select U.S.-listed foreign issuers such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), offering marginally broader geographic representation within the same industry.
  • Expense ratios are competitive, with SMH at 0.35% and SHOC at 0.40%, making both cost-efficient options relative to broader technology sector funds.
  • Top holdings in both ETFs are dominated by a small number of large-cap names, including NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), resulting in high concentration risk and similar performance drivers tied to AI and semiconductor demand cycles.
  • SHOC incorporates active corporate governance engagement alongside its passive indexing approach, whereas SMH follows a purely rules-based index methodology without such overlays.
  • Both ETFs exhibit high correlation to semiconductor industry trends, with positioning influenced by capital spending in chip manufacturing, technological innovation, and global supply chain dynamics.

Introduction

Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) target the same core theme of semiconductor innovation and production. They do not compete directly with broad market funds but serve as specialized vehicles for investors seeking targeted exposure to this high-growth industry. The comparison highlights differences in index methodology, geographic emphasis, and cost structures that may influence suitability depending on investor preferences for concentration, liquidity, and governance considerations within the semiconductor sector.

Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) Overview

Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of the Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Total Return Index. The fund holds approximately 30 to 32 securities, providing exposure to U.S.-listed companies primarily engaged in semiconductor design, manufacturing, and related equipment. Top holdings typically include NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Micron Technology Inc. (MU), Broadcom Inc. (AVGO), Applied Materials Inc. (AMAT), and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD), with the top 10 positions accounting for roughly 75-78% of assets. Sector allocation is 100% technology, focused exclusively on semiconductors. The expense ratio stands at 0.40%. SHOC employs a market-capitalization-weighted approach with periodic rebalancing and incorporates proxy voting and management engagement to promote long-term value creation. It is structured as a non-diversified fund under U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) guidelines.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Overview

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund designed to replicate the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index before fees and expenses. The fund typically holds 25 to 26 securities representing leading U.S.-listed semiconductor producers and equipment makers. Prominent holdings often feature NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSM), Micron Technology Inc. (MU), Applied Materials Inc. (AMAT), and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD), with the top 10 holdings comprising approximately 70% of assets. Like SHOC, sector allocation is 100% technology. The expense ratio is 0.35%. SMH uses a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with liquidity screens and rebalances according to index rules. The fund is classified as non-diversified and emphasizes highly liquid, large-capitalization companies within the semiconductor space.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The semiconductor industry remains central to global technological advancement, driven by demand for artificial intelligence (AI) accelerators, high-performance computing, and advanced manufacturing equipment. Capital expenditures by major chipmakers, supply chain resilience efforts, and ongoing innovation in process nodes continue to shape sector dynamics. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate environments, trade policies, and geopolitical tensions in key manufacturing regions influence capital flows and production timelines. Regulatory developments around export controls and technology leadership add layers of complexity. Both ETFs position investors to capture these thematic trends while exposing them to concentration risks inherent in a capital-intensive, cyclical industry.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have demonstrated strong sensitivity to semiconductor earnings seasons and AI-related capital spending announcements. SHOC's more U.S.-centric holdings may result in slightly different volatility profiles compared to SMH, which incorporates additional exposure to foundry operations through holdings such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSM). Relative positioning often reflects differences in top-weight concentration and the inclusion of equipment versus pure-play design firms. During periods of sector rotation driven by interest rate expectations or inventory adjustments, the funds have shown correlated but not identical responses based on their index compositions. Investors evaluating relative positioning should consider how these structural nuances affect exposure to specific sub-themes like memory chips, logic semiconductors, and fabrication equipment.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. For investors comparing specialized ETFs like SHOC and SMH, the tool offers a streamlined way to explore related securities and monitor thematic opportunities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including marginally lower expense ratio, established liquidity profile, and balanced index construction, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and established market presence within the semiconductor theme. SHOC remains competitive due to its governance overlay and U.S.-focused mandate, making either fund suitable depending on specific allocation preferences and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SHOC vs. SMH commentary
Jul 31, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHOC is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 62.4B vs. SHOC (208M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than SHOC: SMH (49.640) vs SHOC (35.909). SHOC was incepted earlier than SMH: SHOC (4 years) vs SMH (15 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than SHOC (0.40). SHOC has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
SHOCSMHSHOC / SMH
Gain YTD35.90949.64072%
Net Assets208M62.4B0%
Total Expense Ratio0.400.35114%
Turnover25.0012.00208%
Yield0.110.1768%
Fund Existence4 years15 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHOCSMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHOC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBOAX25.49N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Balanced Opportunity A
CBDYX58.21N/A
N/A
Columbia Balanced Inst3
MGKAX11.90N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Global Permanence A
GSICX30.81N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs International Eq ESG C
AMANX78.25-1.12
-1.41%
Amana Income Investor

SHOC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOC has been closely correlated with SWKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOC jumps, then SWKS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHOC
1D Price
Change %
SHOC100%
-5.30%
SWKS - SHOC
71%
Closely correlated
-5.40%
ACLS - SHOC
71%
Closely correlated
-6.65%
GFS - SHOC
70%
Closely correlated
-3.98%
POWI - SHOC
70%
Closely correlated
-4.44%
QRVO - SHOC
67%
Closely correlated
-2.46%
More