Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) target the same core theme of semiconductor innovation and production. They do not compete directly with broad market funds but serve as specialized vehicles for investors seeking targeted exposure to this high-growth industry. The comparison highlights differences in index methodology, geographic emphasis, and cost structures that may influence suitability depending on investor preferences for concentration, liquidity, and governance considerations within the semiconductor sector.
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of the Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Total Return Index. The fund holds approximately 30 to 32 securities, providing exposure to U.S.-listed companies primarily engaged in semiconductor design, manufacturing, and related equipment. Top holdings typically include NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Micron Technology Inc. (MU), Broadcom Inc. (AVGO), Applied Materials Inc. (AMAT), and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD), with the top 10 positions accounting for roughly 75-78% of assets. Sector allocation is 100% technology, focused exclusively on semiconductors. The expense ratio stands at 0.40%. SHOC employs a market-capitalization-weighted approach with periodic rebalancing and incorporates proxy voting and management engagement to promote long-term value creation. It is structured as a non-diversified fund under U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) guidelines.
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund designed to replicate the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index before fees and expenses. The fund typically holds 25 to 26 securities representing leading U.S.-listed semiconductor producers and equipment makers. Prominent holdings often feature NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSM), Micron Technology Inc. (MU), Applied Materials Inc. (AMAT), and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD), with the top 10 holdings comprising approximately 70% of assets. Like SHOC, sector allocation is 100% technology. The expense ratio is 0.35%. SMH uses a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with liquidity screens and rebalances according to index rules. The fund is classified as non-diversified and emphasizes highly liquid, large-capitalization companies within the semiconductor space.
The semiconductor industry remains central to global technological advancement, driven by demand for artificial intelligence (AI) accelerators, high-performance computing, and advanced manufacturing equipment. Capital expenditures by major chipmakers, supply chain resilience efforts, and ongoing innovation in process nodes continue to shape sector dynamics. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate environments, trade policies, and geopolitical tensions in key manufacturing regions influence capital flows and production timelines. Regulatory developments around export controls and technology leadership add layers of complexity. Both ETFs position investors to capture these thematic trends while exposing them to concentration risks inherent in a capital-intensive, cyclical industry.
In recent market cycles, both ETFs have demonstrated strong sensitivity to semiconductor earnings seasons and AI-related capital spending announcements. SHOC's more U.S.-centric holdings may result in slightly different volatility profiles compared to SMH, which incorporates additional exposure to foundry operations through holdings such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSM). Relative positioning often reflects differences in top-weight concentration and the inclusion of equipment versus pure-play design firms. During periods of sector rotation driven by interest rate expectations or inventory adjustments, the funds have shown correlated but not identical responses based on their index compositions. Investors evaluating relative positioning should consider how these structural nuances affect exposure to specific sub-themes like memory chips, logic semiconductors, and fabrication equipment.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. For investors comparing specialized ETFs like SHOC and SMH, the tool offers a streamlined way to explore related securities and monitor thematic opportunities.
Based on observable structural factors including marginally lower expense ratio, established liquidity profile, and balanced index construction, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and established market presence within the semiconductor theme. SHOC remains competitive due to its governance overlay and U.S.-focused mandate, making either fund suitable depending on specific allocation preferences and risk tolerance.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| SHOC | SMH | SHOC / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 35.909 | 49.640 | 72% |
| Net Assets | 208M | 62.4B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.35 | 114% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 12.00 | 208% |
| Yield | 0.11 | 0.17 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
| SHOC | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 21 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOC has been closely correlated with SWKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOC jumps, then SWKS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOC | 100% | -5.30% | ||
| SWKS - SHOC | 71% Closely correlated | -5.40% | ||
| ACLS - SHOC | 71% Closely correlated | -6.65% | ||
| GFS - SHOC | 70% Closely correlated | -3.98% | ||
| POWI - SHOC | 70% Closely correlated | -4.44% | ||
| QRVO - SHOC | 67% Closely correlated | -2.46% | ||
More | ||||