Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SHOC vs SMH
SHOC vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts SHOC vs SMH
SHOC vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SHOC vs. SMH commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHOC is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 68.7B vs. SHOC (236M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than SHOC: SMH (55.755) vs SHOC (51.760). SHOC was incepted earlier than SMH: SHOC (4 years) vs SMH (15 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than SHOC (0.40). SHOC has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| SHOC | SMH | SHOC / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 51.760 | 55.755 | 93% |
| Net Assets | 236M | 68.7B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.35 | 114% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 12.00 | 208% |
| Yield | 0.14 | 0.20 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SHOC | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 89% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 78% | 23 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SHOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOC has been closely correlated with SWKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOC jumps, then SWKS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOC | 100% | -2.02% | ||
| SWKS - SHOC | 71% Closely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| ACLS - SHOC | 71% Closely correlated | -6.62% | ||
| GFS - SHOC | 70% Closely correlated | -2.65% | ||
| POWI - SHOC | 70% Closely correlated | -4.78% | ||
| STM - SHOC | 69% Closely correlated | -3.56% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -1.55% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 89% Closely correlated | -6.33% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -3.86% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -3.53% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| MU - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
More | ||||