Ad is loading...
SHOC vs VGT
SHOC vs VGT Comparison
Open Charts SHOC vs VGT
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
Price$34.25
Change-$2.42 (-6.60%)
Volume$100
Net Assets70.26M
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
Price$484.70
Change-$26.80 (-5.24%)
Volume$1.93K
Net Assets97.55B
SHOC vs VGT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SHOC vs. VGT commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHOC is a Hold and VGT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VGT has more net assets: 97.5B vs. SHOC (70.3M). VGT has a higher annual dividend yield than SHOC: VGT (-17.634) vs SHOC (-20.079). SHOC was incepted earlier than VGT: SHOC (3 years) vs VGT (21 years). VGT (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than SHOC (0.40). SHOC has a higher turnover VGT (13.00) vs VGT (13.00).
| SHOC | VGT | SHOC / VGT | |
| Gain YTD | -20.079 | -17.634 | 114% |
| Net Assets | 70.3M | 97.5B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.09 | 444% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 13.00 | 223% |
| Yield | 0.33 | 0.59 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SHOC | VGT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SHOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOC has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOC jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOC | 100% | -8.73% | ||
| KLAC - SHOC | 86% Closely correlated | -9.53% | ||
| LRCX - SHOC | 86% Closely correlated | -11.60% | ||
| AMAT - SHOC | 84% Closely correlated | -8.28% | ||
| ASML - SHOC | 82% Closely correlated | -6.84% | ||
| MKSI - SHOC | 78% Closely correlated | -20.93% | ||
More | ||||
VGT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VGT has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VGT jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VGT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGT | 100% | -7.24% | ||
| KLAC - VGT | 81% Closely correlated | -9.53% | ||
| CDNS - VGT | 80% Closely correlated | -6.05% | ||
| AMAT - VGT | 79% Closely correlated | -8.28% | ||
| SNPS - VGT | 79% Closely correlated | -4.74% | ||
| MKSI - VGT | 79% Closely correlated | -20.93% | ||
More | ||||