SHOO
Price
$37.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
2.7B
91 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WWW
Price
$14.94
Change
+$0.02 (+0.13%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
1.22B
97 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHOO vs WWW

Header iconSHOO vs WWW Comparison
Open Charts SHOO vs WWWBanner chart's image
Steven Madden
Price$37.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$658.41K
Capitalization2.7B
Wolverine World Wide
Price$14.94
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
Volume$1.1M
Capitalization1.22B
SHOO vs WWW Comparison Chart in %
SHOO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WWW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SHOO vs. WWW commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHOO is a Hold and WWW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (SHOO: $37.17 vs. WWW: $14.94)
Brand notoriety: SHOO and WWW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wholesale Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SHOO: 46% vs. WWW: 50%
Market capitalization -- SHOO: $2.7B vs. WWW: $1.22B
SHOO [@Wholesale Distributors] is valued at $2.7B. WWW’s [@Wholesale Distributors] market capitalization is $1.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry ranges from $92.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry is $7.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SHOO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWWW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SHOO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WWW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHOO is a better buy in the long-term than WWW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHOO’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WWW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SHOO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WWW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WWW is a better buy in the short-term than SHOO.

Price Growth

SHOO (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а -4.30% price change this week, while WWW (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was -6.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

SHOO is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

WWW is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wholesale Distributors (-0.96% weekly)

Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHOO($2.7B) has a higher market cap than WWW($1.23B). SHOO has higher P/E ratio than WWW: SHOO (47.65) vs WWW (13.94). SHOO YTD gains are higher at: -10.605 vs. WWW (-31.280). WWW (165M) and SHOO (160M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . SHOO has less debt than WWW: SHOO (539M) vs WWW (860M). SHOO has higher revenues than WWW: SHOO (2.32B) vs WWW (1.82B).
SHOOWWWSHOO / WWW
Capitalization2.7B1.23B220%
EBITDA160M165M97%
Gain YTD-10.605-31.28034%
P/E Ratio47.6513.94342%
Revenue2.32B1.82B127%
Total Cash123MN/A-
Total Debt539M860M63%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHOO vs WWW: Fundamental Ratings
SHOO
WWW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7352
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61100
SMR RATING
1..100
6535
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4193
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
592
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WWW's Valuation (18) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as SHOO (41). This means that WWW’s stock grew similarly to SHOO’s over the last 12 months.

SHOO's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WWW (100). This means that SHOO’s stock grew somewhat faster than WWW’s over the last 12 months.

WWW's SMR Rating (35) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as SHOO (65). This means that WWW’s stock grew similarly to SHOO’s over the last 12 months.

SHOO's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WWW (93). This means that SHOO’s stock grew somewhat faster than WWW’s over the last 12 months.

SHOO's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is significantly better than the same rating for WWW (92). This means that SHOO’s stock grew significantly faster than WWW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHOOWWW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHOO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WWW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGCEX16.76N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Global Equity C
LAVTX17.18N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R5
HSWCX20.91N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders International Stk C
HLEZX20.88N/A
N/A
Harding Loevner Instl Emerg Mkts Z
HLPPX9.59-0.05
-0.52%
LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity P

SHOO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOO has been loosely correlated with OXM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHOO jumps, then OXM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHOO
1D Price
Change %
SHOO100%
N/A
OXM - SHOO
64%
Loosely correlated
-5.59%
KTB - SHOO
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
COLM - SHOO
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.97%
DBI - SHOO
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.02%
NKE - SHOO
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
More