SJM
Price
$119.26
Change
-$2.95 (-2.41%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
12.75B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TR
Price
$39.02
Change
-$0.37 (-0.94%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
2.95B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SJM vs TR

SJM vs TR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? J.M. Smucker (SJM) vs. Tootsie Roll Industries (TR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • SJM is a diversified consumer staples giant with a market cap near $12.6 billion, while TR is a niche confectionery pure-play valued at roughly $2.9 billion.
  • SJM offers a significantly higher dividend yield of approximately 3.8% with 25 consecutive years of dividend growth, compared with TR's modest 0.9% yield.
  • Valuation divergence is stark: SJM trades at a forward P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of about 11x, while TR commands a trailing P/E near 29x, reflecting different growth expectations and market dynamics.
  • Both companies face commodity cost headwinds — SJM with coffee pricing volatility and TR with elevated cocoa costs — though both are seeing easing pressure into late 2026 and 2027.
  • SJM recently beat quarterly earnings estimates and received multiple analyst upgrades, while TR has pulled back below its 200-day moving average amid a higher-valuation reassessment.
  • SJM's diversified brand portfolio spans coffee, spreads, frozen handhelds, pet food, and sweet baked snacks, whereas TR's narrow confectionery focus heightens its sensitivity to category-specific trends.

Introduction

Investors evaluating the consumer staples sector often encounter a wide spectrum of opportunity — from diversified packaged-food conglomerates to tightly focused niche players. SJM (The J.M. Smucker Company) and TR (Tootsie Roll Industries) sit at opposite ends of that spectrum. SJM commands a multi-billion-dollar portfolio of iconic brands spanning coffee, peanut butter, pet snacks, and frozen foods. TR, by contrast, is a family-controlled confectioner with a century-old legacy built around candy brands like Tootsie Roll, Tootsie Pop, and Junior Mints. This stock comparison examines how these two fundamentally different staples companies stack up across momentum, valuation, risk, and market positioning — offering relevant perspective for income-oriented and growth-conscious investors alike.

SJM Overview and Recent Performance

The J.M. Smucker Company is a diversified food and beverage manufacturer whose portfolio includes leading brands such as Folgers, Dunkin', Café Bustelo, Jif, Uncrustables, Smucker's, Hostess, Milk-Bone, and Meow Mix. In recent weeks, SJM has demonstrated notable resilience. The company closed its fiscal 2026 with fourth-quarter adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of $2.77, surpassing consensus estimates, while comparable net sales rose 5% year over year. This performance was supported by net price realization across coffee and sweet baked goods, alongside robust growth in the Uncrustables frozen sandwich platform. Free cash flow (FCF) reached approximately $1.16 billion for the full fiscal year, enabling $720 million in debt repayment alongside consistent shareholder returns. The company also announced a 2% dividend increase to $1.12 per share, marking its 25th consecutive fiscal year of dividend growth. Analysts at JPMorgan, Bernstein, RBC, and Evercore have issued outperform-equivalent ratings with price targets ranging from $125 to $137. That said, SJM's fiscal 2027 guidance calls for a 3–4% net sales decline tied largely to expected green coffee deflation being passed through to consumers. Shares have rebounded meaningfully from the mid-$80s level reached after mid-2025's Hostess-related impairment charge, reflecting improving sentiment around the company's cash generation and deleveraging progress.

TR Overview and Recent Performance

Tootsie Roll Industries is a Chicago-based confectionery manufacturer with a focused product lineup that includes Tootsie Roll, Tootsie Pop, Charms Blow Pop, DOTS, Andes Mints, Junior Mints, Dubble Bubble, and Charleston Chew, among others. The company is characterized by high insider ownership — approximately 57.6% — and a relatively small public float of roughly 17 million shares. This structural tightness has periodically drawn attention from retail traders, though it also limits liquidity. In recent market activity, TR shares have pulled back from their 52-week highs near $44, recently trading around $38–$39 and crossing below their 200-day moving average. The stock has declined roughly 10% over the trailing three-month period, partly reflecting a reassessment of its premium valuation. TR's trailing P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of approximately 28–29x sits well above the broader food industry average near 17x. First-quarter 2026 net sales rose a modest 2% year over year to approximately $151.5 million, though cocoa cost pressures continue to weigh on gross margins. On the positive side, management has signaled that declining cocoa commodity prices should translate into lower input costs beginning in late 2026 and into 2027, offering a potential margin tailwind. The company maintains a clean balance sheet with negligible debt and consistent, though modest, profitability.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's most effective AI-powered trading bots, drawn from a universe of hundreds of virtual agents that collectively trade thousands of different tickers. These bots are not randomly selected — only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in this section. The bots span a wide range of trading styles, from 5-minute and 15-minute intraday strategies to longer-duration swing trading approaches, with annualized returns among top performers recently reaching well into the double and even triple digits. Win rates across featured bots have ranged from approximately 57% to over 75%, and profit factors — a measure of reward relative to risk — have exceeded 2.0 and even 4.0 in select cases. Each bot operates with its own defined strategy, timeframe, risk parameters, and ticker universe, giving traders the flexibility to align automated trading with their personal objectives. To explore which AI trading bots are currently leading, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The contrast between SJM and TR extends well beyond market capitalization. SJM operates across five distinct reporting segments — U.S. Retail Coffee, Frozen Handheld and Spreads, Pet Foods, Sweet Baked Snacks, and Away From Home — while TR competes in a single category: confectionery. This diversification insulates SJM from isolated demand shocks but also exposes it to complex supply chain and integration challenges, as evidenced by the Hostess impairment. TR's narrow focus is both a strength and a vulnerability — it enables deep brand loyalty and operational simplicity, but leaves the company with fewer levers to offset category-specific headwinds such as changing snacking preferences or sustained cocoa inflation. On valuation, the disparity is wide: SJM's forward P/E of roughly 11x reflects a market that is pricing in modest near-term growth and coffee-price-driven sales normalization, while TR's trailing P/E near 29x signals either embedded expectations of meaningful earnings acceleration or a scarcity premium tied to its tightly held float. From an income perspective, SJM's 3.8% dividend yield dwarfs TR's 0.9% payout, making SJM far more relevant for yield-seeking portfolios. In terms of recent momentum, SJM has recorded a stronger recovery trajectory, aided by earnings beats and analyst upgrades, while TR has encountered technical resistance and selling pressure after reaching elevated valuation levels earlier in the year.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, catalyst visibility, valuation support, and relative risk profile, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor SJM over TR in the current market environment. SJM benefits from a more diversified revenue base, stronger free cash flow generation, a substantially higher dividend yield backed by a quarter-century of consecutive increases, and a forward valuation that appears considerably more grounded relative to earnings power. Although fiscal 2027 sales guidance anticipates a modest contraction due to lower coffee pricing, the company's deleveraging momentum and cost discipline provide a constructive backdrop. TR's premium valuation, narrower business model, and recent technical weakness — including a breach below its 200-day moving average — introduce a higher degree of uncertainty in the near term. The eventual cocoa-cost tailwind may support TR's margins, but the timing and magnitude remain probabilistic. In a side-by-side assessment weighted toward stability, cash returns, and valuation support, SJM presents the more favorable AI-aligned profile under current conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SJM vs. TR commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SJM is a Hold and TR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (SJM: $119.26 vs. TR: $39.02)
Brand notoriety: SJM and TR are both not notable
SJM represents the Food: Major Diversified, while TR is part of the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SJM: 109% vs. TR: 45%
Market capitalization -- SJM: $12.75B vs. TR: $2.95B
SJM [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $12.75B. TR’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $2.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $255.67B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $79.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $3.23B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $23.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SJM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SJM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SJM is a better buy in the long-term than TR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SJM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SJM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SJM and TR are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SJM (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +0.79% price change this week, while TR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +4.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.88%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -24.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

SJM is expected to report earnings on Sep 01, 2026.

TR is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.21% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.68% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SJM($12.7B) has a higher market cap than TR($2.95B). TR has higher P/E ratio than SJM: TR (30.86) vs SJM (22.05). SJM YTD gains are higher at: 24.518 vs. TR (10.216). SJM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 876M vs. TR (157M). TR has less debt than SJM: TR (13.6M) vs SJM (7.09B). SJM has higher revenues than TR: SJM (9.05B) vs TR (736M).
SJMTRSJM / TR
Capitalization12.7B2.95B431%
EBITDA876M157M558%
Gain YTD24.51810.216240%
P/E Ratio22.0530.8671%
Revenue9.05B736M1,230%
Total Cash58.6MN/A-
Total Debt7.09B13.6M52,125%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SJM vs TR: Fundamental Ratings
SJM
TR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3477
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8756
SMR RATING
1..100
9269
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2157
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2248
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SJM's Valuation (18) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TR (70). This means that SJM’s stock grew somewhat faster than TR’s over the last 12 months.

TR's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SJM (87). This means that TR’s stock grew similarly to SJM’s over the last 12 months.

TR's SMR Rating (69) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SJM (92). This means that TR’s stock grew similarly to SJM’s over the last 12 months.

SJM's Price Growth Rating (21) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TR (57). This means that SJM’s stock grew somewhat faster than TR’s over the last 12 months.

SJM's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as TR (48). This means that SJM’s stock grew similarly to TR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SJMTR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SJM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IYY181.801.20
+0.66%
iShares Dow Jones US ETF
DEMZ46.770.15
+0.32%
Democratic Large Cap Core ETF
NMAY29.080.09
+0.31%
Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - May
JGH12.520.01
+0.08%
NUVEEN GLOBAL HIGH Income FUND
CBTY19.56-0.32
-1.59%
Calamos Bitcoin 80 Str Alt Prt ETF-July