SKIN
Price
$1.97
Change
+$0.03 (+1.55%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
249.85M
45 days until earnings call
SRTSF
Price
$16.96
Change
+$1.11 (+7.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
965.01M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SKIN vs SRTSF

Header iconSKIN vs SRTSF Comparison
Open Charts SKIN vs SRTSFBanner chart's image
Beauty Health Company (The)
Price$1.97
Change+$0.03 (+1.55%)
Volume$510.21K
Capitalization249.85M
Sarantis SA
Price$16.96
Change+$1.11 (+7.00%)
Volume$565
Capitalization965.01M
SKIN vs SRTSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SKIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRTSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SKIN vs. SRTSF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SKIN is a Hold and SRTSF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (SKIN: $1.97 vs. SRTSF: $16.96)
Brand notoriety: SKIN and SRTSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SKIN: 43% vs. SRTSF: 48%
Market capitalization -- SKIN: $249.85M vs. SRTSF: $965.01M
SKIN [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $249.85M. SRTSF’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $965.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $356.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $21.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SKIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSRTSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SKIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SRTSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SRTSF is a better buy in the long-term than SKIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SKIN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRTSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SKIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SRTSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SRTSF is a better buy in the short-term than SKIN.

Price Growth

SKIN (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -13.60% price change this week, while SRTSF (@Household/Personal Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

SKIN is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-2.09% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SRTSF($965M) has a higher market cap than SKIN($250M). SRTSF YTD gains are higher at: 52.171 vs. SKIN (23.899). SRTSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 82.2M vs. SKIN (20.7M). SKIN has more cash in the bank: 212M vs. SRTSF (51M). SRTSF has less debt than SKIN: SRTSF (83.7M) vs SKIN (377M). SRTSF has higher revenues than SKIN: SRTSF (600M) vs SKIN (310M).
SKINSRTSFSKIN / SRTSF
Capitalization250M965M26%
EBITDA20.7M82.2M25%
Gain YTD23.89952.17146%
P/E RatioN/A20.27-
Revenue310M600M52%
Total Cash212M51M416%
Total Debt377M83.7M450%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRTSF: Fundamental Ratings
SRTSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
46
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27
SMR RATING
1..100
62
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SKINSRTSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
80%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SKIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRTSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCIEX21.37N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders International Stk I
SUHAX35.47N/A
N/A
DWS Health and Wellness A
GCEDX10.13N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income Ins
NQQQX45.42N/A
N/A
Shelton Nasdaq-100 Index Institutional
TIGVX24.80-0.09
-0.36%
Thornburg International Growth R3

SKIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SKIN has been loosely correlated with RPHCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SKIN jumps, then RPHCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKIN
1D Price
Change %
SKIN100%
+1.55%
RPHCF - SKIN
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HNST - SKIN
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
NUS - SKIN
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.00%
COTY - SKIN
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
IPAR - SKIN
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
More

SRTSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRTSF and UNLRF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRTSF and UNLRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRTSF
1D Price
Change %
SRTSF100%
N/A
UNLRF - SRTSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KITAF - SRTSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RPHCF - SRTSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SKIN - SRTSF
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
YSG - SRTSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
More