SKIN
Price
$1.68
Change
-$0.02 (-1.18%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
213.07M
36 days until earnings call
TANH
Price
$1.80
Change
-$0.02 (-1.10%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SKIN vs TANH

Header iconSKIN vs TANH Comparison
Open Charts SKIN vs TANHBanner chart's image
Beauty Health Company (The)
Price$1.68
Change-$0.02 (-1.18%)
Volume$453.67K
Capitalization213.07M
Tantech Holdings
Price$1.80
Change-$0.02 (-1.10%)
Volume$43.46K
Capitalization2.8M
SKIN vs TANH Comparison Chart in %
SKIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TANH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SKIN vs. TANH commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SKIN is a StrongBuy and TANH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SKIN: $1.68 vs. TANH: $1.80)
Brand notoriety: SKIN and TANH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SKIN: 39% vs. TANH: 6%
Market capitalization -- SKIN: $213.07M vs. TANH: $2.8M
SKIN [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $213.07M. TANH’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $2.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $356.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $20.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SKIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTANH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SKIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TANH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SKIN is a better buy in the long-term than TANH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SKIN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TANH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SKIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TANH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SKIN is a better buy in the short-term than TANH.

Price Growth

SKIN (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -14.72% price change this week, while TANH (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +2.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +3.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

SKIN is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+3.42% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SKIN($213M) has a higher market cap than TANH($2.8M). SKIN YTD gains are higher at: 5.660 vs. TANH (-78.673). SKIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 20.7M vs. TANH (7.42M). TANH has less debt than SKIN: TANH (5.57M) vs SKIN (377M). SKIN has higher revenues than TANH: SKIN (310M) vs TANH (49.1M).
SKINTANHSKIN / TANH
Capitalization213M2.8M7,599%
EBITDA20.7M7.42M279%
Gain YTD5.660-78.673-7%
P/E RatioN/A0.05-
Revenue310M49.1M631%
Total Cash212MN/A-
Total Debt377M5.57M6,766%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TANH: Fundamental Ratings
TANH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
98
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SKINTANH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SKIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TANH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPNFF0.02N/A
+6.60%
ImagineAR, Inc.
RYAOF28.90N/A
N/A
Ryanair Holdings Plc
OKIEF6.66N/A
N/A
OKI Electric Industry Co., Ltd.
NTBP1150.00N/A
N/A
New Tripoli Bancorp, Inc.
ARCVF54.02-1.07
-1.94%
Arcadis NV

SKIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SKIN has been loosely correlated with RPHCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SKIN jumps, then RPHCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKIN
1D Price
Change %
SKIN100%
-1.18%
RPHCF - SKIN
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HNST - SKIN
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NUS - SKIN
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.99%
IPAR - SKIN
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
COTY - SKIN
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
More