SLF vs SZLMY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLF is a Buy and SZLMY is a StrongSell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSZLMY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- SLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SZLMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SZLMY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SZLMY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
SLF (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +2.26% price change this week, while SZLMY (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was -0.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.
Reported Earning Dates
SLF is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Multi-Line Insurance (-0.87% weekly)A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.
| SLF | SZLMY | SLF / SZLMY | |
| Capitalization | 31.6B | 18B | 176% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.120 | 22.815 | 71% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.86 | 11.56 | 120% |
| Revenue | 32.7B | 21.3B | 154% |
| Total Cash | 27.5B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 13.3B | N/A | - |
SLF | SZLMY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SLF's Valuation (31) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SZLMY (48) in the null industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew similarly to SZLMY’s over the last 12 months.
SZLMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLF (50) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SZLMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLF’s over the last 12 months.
SZLMY's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as SLF (97) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SZLMY’s stock grew similarly to SLF’s over the last 12 months.
SLF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SZLMY (47) in the null industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew similarly to SZLMY’s over the last 12 months.
SZLMY's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as SLF (41) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SZLMY’s stock grew similarly to SLF’s over the last 12 months.
| SLF | SZLMY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 7 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SAT | 24.66 | 0.14 | +0.57% |
| Saratoga Investment Corp | |||
| AFIF | 9.19 | 0.01 | +0.11% |
| Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF | |||
| DWLD | 37.95 | -0.05 | -0.12% |
| Davis Select Worldwide ETF | |||
| BULZ | 170.65 | -0.86 | -0.50% |
| MicroSectors™ Slct FANG Inn 3X Lvgd ETNs | |||
| SQLV | 44.63 | -1.09 | -2.38% |
| Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF | |||
SLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLF has been loosely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLF jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLF | 100% | +0.62% | ||
| HIG - SLF | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| AVVIY - SLF | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| AXAHY - SLF | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| EQH - SLF | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| ALIZY - SLF | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
More | ||||
SZLMY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SZLMY and ARZGY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SZLMY and ARZGY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SZLMY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SZLMY | 100% | +0.27% | ||
| ARZGY - SZLMY | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
| ZURVY - SZLMY | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.34% | ||
| AVVIY - SZLMY | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
| SLF - SZLMY | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.62% | ||
| ALIZY - SZLMY | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.47% | ||
More | ||||