SLFPY
Price
$10.62
Change
-$0.32 (-2.93%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
4.51B
STJPF
Price
$18.00
Change
+$1.36 (+8.17%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
8.66B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SLFPY vs STJPF

Header iconSLFPY vs STJPF Comparison
Open Charts SLFPY vs STJPFBanner chart's image
ABERDEEN GROUP
Price$10.62
Change-$0.32 (-2.93%)
Volume$124
Capitalization4.51B
St. James Place Capital
Price$18.00
Change+$1.36 (+8.17%)
Volume$4.7K
Capitalization8.66B
SLFPY vs STJPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SLFPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STJPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SLFPY vs. STJPF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLFPY is a Buy and STJPF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SLFPY: $10.62 vs. STJPF: $18.00)
Brand notoriety: SLFPY and STJPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SLFPY: 13% vs. STJPF: 352%
Market capitalization -- SLFPY: $4.51B vs. STJPF: $8.66B
SLFPY [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.51B. STJPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SLFPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTJPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SLFPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • STJPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLFPY is a better buy in the long-term than STJPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLFPY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STJPF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SLFPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • STJPF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLFPY is a better buy in the short-term than STJPF.

Price Growth

SLFPY (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while STJPF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STJPF($8.66B) has a higher market cap than SLFPY($4.51B). STJPF has higher P/E ratio than SLFPY: STJPF (14.20) vs SLFPY (11.35). STJPF YTD gains are higher at: 104.778 vs. SLFPY (62.914). STJPF has less debt than SLFPY: STJPF (402M) vs SLFPY (546M). STJPF has higher revenues than SLFPY: STJPF (16.9B) vs SLFPY (1.68B).
SLFPYSTJPFSLFPY / STJPF
Capitalization4.51B8.66B52%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD62.914104.77860%
P/E Ratio11.3514.2080%
Revenue1.68B16.9B10%
Total CashN/A6.4B-
Total Debt546M402M136%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLFPY vs STJPF: Fundamental Ratings
SLFPY
STJPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4940
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8680
SMR RATING
1..100
6121
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2460
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLFPY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STJPF (79). This means that SLFPY’s stock grew significantly faster than STJPF’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as SLFPY (86). This means that STJPF’s stock grew similarly to SLFPY’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLFPY (61). This means that STJPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLFPY’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as SLFPY (44). This means that STJPF’s stock grew similarly to SLFPY’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPY's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STJPF (60). This means that SLFPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than STJPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLFPYSTJPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SLFPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STJPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ISCWX97.34N/A
N/A
Voya Multi-Manager International Sm Cp W
VITAX357.20N/A
N/A
Vanguard Information Technology Idx Adm
IGMIX9.99N/A
N/A
Voya Global Insights Portfolio I
NWHDX16.19N/A
N/A
Nationwide Bailard Cogntv Val A
PZHEX13.49N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity Z

SLFPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLFPY and SLFPF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLFPY and SLFPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLFPY
1D Price
Change %
SLFPY100%
N/A
SLFPF - SLFPY
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
OWL - SLFPY
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
BLK - SLFPY
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
FNCSF - SLFPY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
CNS - SLFPY
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
More

STJPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STJPF and HRZN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STJPF and HRZN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STJPF
1D Price
Change %
STJPF100%
N/A
HRZN - STJPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
SLFPF - STJPF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
VSQTF - STJPF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
SLFPY - STJPF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TETAA - STJPF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More