SLFPY
Price
$10.44
Change
+$0.34 (+3.37%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
4.61B
STJPF
Price
$16.60
Change
-$1.40 (-7.78%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
8.83B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SLFPY vs STJPF

Header iconSLFPY vs STJPF Comparison
Open Charts SLFPY vs STJPFBanner chart's image
ABERDEEN GROUP
Price$10.44
Change+$0.34 (+3.37%)
Volume$252
Capitalization4.61B
St. James Place Capital
Price$16.60
Change-$1.40 (-7.78%)
Volume$125
Capitalization8.83B
SLFPY vs STJPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SLFPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STJPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SLFPY vs. STJPF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLFPY is a Hold and STJPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (SLFPY: $10.44 vs. STJPF: $16.60)
Brand notoriety: SLFPY and STJPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SLFPY: 17% vs. STJPF: 9%
Market capitalization -- SLFPY: $4.61B vs. STJPF: $8.83B
SLFPY [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.61B. STJPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $177.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SLFPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTJPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SLFPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • STJPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLFPY is a better buy in the long-term than STJPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLFPY’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STJPF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SLFPY’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • STJPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLFPY is a better buy in the short-term than STJPF.

Price Growth

SLFPY (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.83% price change this week, while STJPF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.99% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STJPF($8.83B) has a higher market cap than SLFPY($4.61B). STJPF has higher P/E ratio than SLFPY: STJPF (13.02) vs SLFPY (11.09). STJPF YTD gains are higher at: 88.851 vs. SLFPY (60.114). STJPF has less debt than SLFPY: STJPF (402M) vs SLFPY (546M). STJPF has higher revenues than SLFPY: STJPF (16.9B) vs SLFPY (1.68B).
SLFPYSTJPFSLFPY / STJPF
Capitalization4.61B8.83B52%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD60.11488.85168%
P/E Ratio11.0913.0285%
Revenue1.68B16.9B10%
Total CashN/A6.4B-
Total Debt546M402M136%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLFPY vs STJPF: Fundamental Ratings
SLFPY
STJPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8099
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8283
SMR RATING
1..100
6221
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2365
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLFPY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STJPF (65). This means that SLFPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than STJPF’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as STJPF (83). This means that SLFPY’s stock grew similarly to STJPF’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLFPY (62). This means that STJPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLFPY’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as SLFPY (50). This means that STJPF’s stock grew similarly to SLFPY’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPY's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STJPF (65). This means that SLFPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than STJPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLFPYSTJPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SLFPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STJPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASMMX32.59N/A
N/A
Invesco Summit A
GESOX18.96N/A
N/A
Lazard Global Equity Select Port Open
VEIEX34.14N/A
N/A
Vanguard Emerging Mkts Stock Idx Inv
FIDSX16.22N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Financials Port
HNCSX21.80N/A
N/A
Hartford International Growth R4

SLFPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLFPY and SLFPF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLFPY and SLFPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLFPY
1D Price
Change %
SLFPY100%
+3.34%
SLFPF - SLFPY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OWL - SLFPY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
BLK - SLFPY
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
FNCSF - SLFPY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNS - SLFPY
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
More

STJPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STJPF and HRZN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STJPF and HRZN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STJPF
1D Price
Change %
STJPF100%
N/A
HRZN - STJPF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLFPF - STJPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VSQTF - STJPF
6%
Poorly correlated
-9.04%
SLFPY - STJPF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.34%
TETAA - STJPF
4%
Poorly correlated
-6.45%
More