SLGGF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.01 (-4.76%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
616.32M
TMASF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.02 (-9.09%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
6.42M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SLGGF vs TMASF

Header iconSLGGF vs TMASF Comparison
Open Charts SLGGF vs TMASFBanner chart's image
Solgold
Price$0.20
Change-$0.01 (-4.76%)
Volume$145.98K
Capitalization616.32M
Temas Resources
Price$0.20
Change-$0.02 (-9.09%)
Volume$14.38K
Capitalization6.42M
SLGGF vs TMASF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SLGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SLGGF vs. TMASF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLGGF is a Hold and TMASF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SLGGF: $0.20 vs. TMASF: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: SLGGF and TMASF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SLGGF: 98% vs. TMASF: 86%
Market capitalization -- SLGGF: $616.32M vs. TMASF: $6.42M
SLGGF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $616.32M. TMASF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $6.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SLGGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTMASF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SLGGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TMASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SLGGF and TMASF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLGGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMASF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SLGGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TMASF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TMASF is a better buy in the short-term than SLGGF.

Price Growth

SLGGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.44% price change this week, while TMASF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +62.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLGGF($616M) has a higher market cap than TMASF($6.42M). TMASF YTD gains are higher at: 266.795 vs. SLGGF (150.000). TMASF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.56M vs. SLGGF (-36.74M). SLGGF has more cash in the bank: 13.2M vs. TMASF (443K). SLGGF (0) and TMASF (0) have equivalent revenues.
SLGGFTMASFSLGGF / TMASF
Capitalization616M6.42M9,602%
EBITDA-36.74M-1.56M2,357%
Gain YTD150.000266.79556%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash13.2M443K2,980%
Total Debt200MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLGGF: Fundamental Ratings
SLGGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
93
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLGGFTMASF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SLGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGRO8.28N/A
N/A
Adecoagro SA
EPR53.26N/A
N/A
EPR Properties
HIG131.67-3.03
-2.25%
The Hartford Insurance Group Inc.
ACTU8.24-0.48
-5.50%
Actuate Therapeutics Inc
BTBD2.30-0.57
-19.86%
BT Brands

SLGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLGGF and EMGDF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLGGF and EMGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLGGF
1D Price
Change %
SLGGF100%
-4.76%
EMGDF - SLGGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.75%
CTXDF - SLGGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USAS - SLGGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.96%
MGMNF - SLGGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
TMASF - SLGGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-7.65%
More