SLGGF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
609.45M
TMASF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.02 (-9.09%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
9.09M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SLGGF vs TMASF

Header iconSLGGF vs TMASF Comparison
Open Charts SLGGF vs TMASFBanner chart's image
Solgold
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization609.45M
Temas Resources
Price$0.20
Change-$0.02 (-9.09%)
Volume$7.82K
Capitalization9.09M
SLGGF vs TMASF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SLGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SLGGF vs. TMASF commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLGGF is a Hold and TMASF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (SLGGF: $0.10 vs. TMASF: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: SLGGF and TMASF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SLGGF: 8% vs. TMASF: 26%
Market capitalization -- SLGGF: $609.45M vs. TMASF: $9.09M
SLGGF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $609.45M. TMASF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $9.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SLGGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTMASF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SLGGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TMASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TMASF is a better buy in the long-term than SLGGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLGGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMASF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SLGGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TMASF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SLGGF and TMASF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SLGGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.32% price change this week, while TMASF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +7.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

TMASF is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.03% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLGGF($609M) has a higher market cap than TMASF($9.09M). TMASF YTD gains are higher at: 289.382 vs. SLGGF (19.125). SLGGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.61M vs. TMASF (-3.47M). SLGGF has more cash in the bank: 48.1M vs. TMASF (57.7K). TMASF has less debt than SLGGF: TMASF (61K) vs SLGGF (144M). SLGGF (0) and TMASF (0) have equivalent revenues.
SLGGFTMASFSLGGF / TMASF
Capitalization609M9.09M6,702%
EBITDA1.61M-3.47M-46%
Gain YTD19.125289.3827%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash48.1M57.7K83,362%
Total Debt144M61K236,066%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLGGF: Fundamental Ratings
SLGGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
93
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLGGFTMASF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SLGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTS44.511.18
+2.72%
CTS Corp
BRT16.040.24
+1.52%
BRT Apartments Corp
MS142.862.00
+1.42%
Morgan Stanley
PB73.560.68
+0.93%
Prosperity Bancshares
DGXX2.68-0.13
-4.63%
Digi Power X Inc

SLGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLGGF and EMGDF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLGGF and EMGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLGGF
1D Price
Change %
SLGGF100%
-6.51%
EMGDF - SLGGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-8.15%
CTXDF - SLGGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USAS - SLGGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
MGMNF - SLGGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.05%
TMASF - SLGGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-8.23%
More

TMASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TMASF and FSUMF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMASF and FSUMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMASF
1D Price
Change %
TMASF100%
-8.23%
FSUMF - TMASF
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.94%
SLGGF - TMASF
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.51%
NVAAF - TMASF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YORKF - TMASF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.43%
NWCCF - TMASF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More