Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SLMCX vs STPAX
SLMCX vs STPAX Comparison
Open Charts SLMCX vs STPAX
SLMCX vs STPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SLMCX vs. STPAX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLMCX is a Hold and STPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 29.3B vs. STPAX (40.6M). SLMCX (0.00) and STPAX (0.00) have matching dividends . SLMCX was incepted earlier than STPAX: SLMCX (43 years) vs STPAX (29 years). STPAX (2.82) is less costly to investors than SLMCX (1.16). SLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. STPAX (7.00). SLMCX (6%) and STPAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. SLMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than STPAX: SLMCX (2000) vs STPAX (2500). SLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 64.89 vs. STPAX (-3.99). SLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 88.76 vs. STPAX (-26.18).
| SLMCX | STPAX | SLMCX / STPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 2.82 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 2.82 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 56.260 | 8.438 | 667% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.3B | 40.6M | 72,167% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 64.89 | -3.99 | -1,625% |
| Returns for 3 years | 130.02 | 13.62 | 955% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.76 | -26.18 | -339% |
| Returns for 10 years | 315.02 | 35.02 | 899% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement