Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SLMCX vs WSTAX
SLMCX vs WSTAX Comparison
Open Charts SLMCX vs WSTAX
SLMCX vs WSTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SLMCX vs. WSTAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLMCX is a Buy and WSTAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 28.9B vs. WSTAX (8.07B). SLMCX (0.00) and WSTAX (0.00) have matching dividends . SLMCX was incepted earlier than WSTAX: SLMCX (43 years) vs WSTAX (26 years). WSTAX (1.17) and SLMCX (1.16) have similar cost to investors . WSTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. SLMCX (47.00). SLMCX (6%) and WSTAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. WSTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLMCX: WSTAX (1000) vs SLMCX (2000). SLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 58.81 vs. WSTAX (19.60). SLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 90.07 vs. WSTAX (-24.25).
| SLMCX | WSTAX | SLMCX / WSTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.16 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.17 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 56.324 | 34.911 | 161% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.9B | 8.07B | 358% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 58.81 | 19.60 | 300% |
| Returns for 3 years | 133.25 | 73.29 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.07 | -24.25 | -371% |
| Returns for 10 years | 310.94 | 58.58 | 531% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers