Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SLMCX vs WSTAX
SLMCX vs WSTAX Comparison
Open Charts SLMCX vs WSTAX
SLMCX vs WSTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SLMCX vs. WSTAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLMCX is a Hold and WSTAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 28.7B vs. WSTAX (8.23B). SLMCX (0.00) and WSTAX (0.00) have matching dividends . SLMCX was incepted earlier than WSTAX: SLMCX (43 years) vs WSTAX (26 years). WSTAX (1.18) and SLMCX (1.16) have similar cost to investors . WSTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. SLMCX (33.00). SLMCX (6%) and WSTAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. WSTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLMCX: WSTAX (1000) vs SLMCX (2000). SLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 71.46 vs. WSTAX (29.89). SLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 89.97 vs. WSTAX (-20.97).
| SLMCX | WSTAX | SLMCX / WSTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.17 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.18 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 52.036 | 36.086 | 144% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.7B | 8.23B | 349% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 71.46 | 29.89 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | 128.62 | 77.15 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.97 | -20.97 | -429% |
| Returns for 10 years | 292.94 | 57.31 | 511% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers