SLVM
Price
$38.47
Change
-$0.30 (-0.77%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.53B
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SUZ
Price
$8.04
Change
-$0.17 (-2.07%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
10.07B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SLVM vs SUZ

SLVM vs SUZ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SLVM vs. SUZ commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLVM is a Hold and SUZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (SLVM: $38.47 vs. SUZ: $8.04)
Brand notoriety: SLVM and SUZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SLVM: 62% vs. SUZ: 89%
Market capitalization -- SLVM: $1.53B vs. SUZ: $10.07B
SLVM [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $1.53B. SUZ’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $10.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $15.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $2.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SLVM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSUZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SLVM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SUZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLVM is a better buy in the long-term than SUZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLVM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUZ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SLVM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SUZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLVM is a better buy in the short-term than SUZ.

Price Growth

SLVM (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а -4.75% price change this week, while SUZ (@Pulp & Paper) price change was -4.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -7.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -26.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

SLVM is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2026.

SUZ is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (-7.94% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SUZ($10.1B) has a higher market cap than SLVM($1.53B). SLVM has higher P/E ratio than SUZ: SLVM (15.45) vs SUZ (4.61). SUZ YTD gains are higher at: -13.910 vs. SLVM (-18.471). SUZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 34.6B vs. SLVM (385M). SUZ has more cash in the bank: 22.3B vs. SLVM (130M). SLVM has less debt than SUZ: SLVM (921M) vs SUZ (97.5B). SUZ has higher revenues than SLVM: SUZ (49.5B) vs SLVM (3.29B).
SLVMSUZSLVM / SUZ
Capitalization1.53B10.1B15%
EBITDA385M34.6B1%
Gain YTD-18.471-13.910133%
P/E Ratio15.454.61335%
Revenue3.29B49.5B7%
Total Cash130M22.3B1%
Total Debt921M97.5B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SUZ: Fundamental Ratings
SUZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
36
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLVMSUZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SLVM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SUZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TCRX0.930.06
+7.20%
TScan Therapeutics
HMN50.751.72
+3.51%
Horace Mann Educators Corp
AAL16.140.06
+0.37%
American Airlines Group
MLAAU10.03N/A
N/A
Mountain Lake Acquisition Corp II
SHOE15.24-0.65
-4.09%
Shoe Station Group Inc

SLVM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLVM has been loosely correlated with CLW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLVM jumps, then CLW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVM
1D Price
Change %
SLVM100%
-0.77%
CLW - SLVM
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
MAGN - SLVM
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
MATV - SLVM
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
SUZ - SLVM
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
MERC - SLVM
15%
Poorly correlated
-6.04%
More

SUZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SUZ and SLVM have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUZ and SLVM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUZ
1D Price
Change %
SUZ100%
-2.07%
SLVM - SUZ
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
MAGN - SUZ
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
CLW - SUZ
18%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
MATV - SUZ
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
MERC - SUZ
8%
Poorly correlated
-6.04%
More