Advertisement
SLVM vs SUZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLVM is a Buy and SUZ is a Hold.
SUZ | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| SLVM | SUZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 7 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 71% | 11 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 65% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SLVM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while SUZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- SLVM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SUZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SLVM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SLVM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SUZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
SLVM (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а +1.83% price change this week, while SUZ (@Pulp & Paper) price change was +1.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.99%.
Reported Earning Dates
SLVM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
SUZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pulp & Paper (-1.92% weekly)The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.
Advertisement
SLVM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLVM has been loosely correlated with CLW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLVM jumps, then CLW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLVM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLVM | 100% | -0.62% | ||
| CLW - SLVM | 39% Loosely correlated | -2.42% | ||
| SUZ - SLVM | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.56% | ||
| MAGN - SLVM | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.23% | ||
| MATV - SLVM | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.15% | ||
| MERC - SLVM | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
More | ||||
SUZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SUZ and SLVM have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUZ and SLVM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SUZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUZ | 100% | -3.56% | ||
| SLVM - SUZ | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.62% | ||
| MAGN - SUZ | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.23% | ||
| CLW - SUZ | 16% Poorly correlated | -2.42% | ||
| MATV - SUZ | 15% Poorly correlated | -2.15% | ||
| MERC - SUZ | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
More | ||||