Advertisement
MATV vs SUZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MATV is a Hold and SUZ is a Buy.
| MATV | SUZ | MATV / SUZ | |
| Capitalization | 659M | 11.6B | 6% |
| EBITDA | 193M | 30.5B | 1% |
| Gain YTD | 1.286 | 0.225 | 572% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.28 | 7.28 | 100% |
| Revenue | 1.99B | 47.8B | 4% |
| Total Cash | 66.3M | 26.3B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 1.04B | 99.4B | 1% |
MATV | SUZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 95 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 55 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 1 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MATV's Valuation (52) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as SUZ (59). This means that MATV’s stock grew similarly to SUZ’s over the last 12 months.
SUZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as MATV (100). This means that SUZ’s stock grew similarly to MATV’s over the last 12 months.
MATV's SMR Rating (46) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as SUZ (50). This means that MATV’s stock grew similarly to SUZ’s over the last 12 months.
MATV's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as SUZ (42). This means that MATV’s stock grew similarly to SUZ’s over the last 12 months.
MATV's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as SUZ (55). This means that MATV’s stock grew similarly to SUZ’s over the last 12 months.
| MATV | SUZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 13 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 65% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MATV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while SUZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MATV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SUZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MATV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUZ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MATV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- SUZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MATV (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -5.69% price change this week, while SUZ (@Pulp & Paper) price change was +2.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.73%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.55%.
Reported Earning Dates
MATV is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
SUZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (-1.79% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
@Pulp & Paper (+0.36% weekly)The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.
Advertisement
MATV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MATV has been loosely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MATV jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MATV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MATV | 100% | -3.16% | ||
| AVNT - MATV | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| OLN - MATV | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| HUN - MATV | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| ASIX - MATV | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| KRO - MATV | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
More | ||||
SUZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SUZ and SLVM have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUZ and SLVM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SUZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUZ | 100% | -0.74% | ||
| SLVM - SUZ | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.74% | ||
| MAGN - SUZ | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.21% | ||
| CLW - SUZ | 16% Poorly correlated | +2.79% | ||
| MATV - SUZ | 15% Poorly correlated | -3.16% | ||
| MERC - SUZ | 11% Poorly correlated | +3.56% | ||
More | ||||