Advertisement
MERC vs SLVM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MERC is a Hold and SLVM is a Buy.
MERC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 1 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MERC | SLVM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 10 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 75% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MERC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while SLVM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MERC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SLVM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MERC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLVM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MERC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SLVM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MERC (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а -13.25% price change this week, while SLVM (@Pulp & Paper) price change was +1.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.99%.
Reported Earning Dates
MERC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
SLVM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pulp & Paper (-1.92% weekly)The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CPZ | 12.95 | 0.13 | +1.01% |
| Calamos Long/Short Equity & Dynamic Income Trust | |||
| PTBD | 18.86 | 0.03 | +0.13% |
| Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF (PTBD) | |||
| ACSV | 47.74 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) | |||
| DVUT | 24.85 | N/A | N/A |
| Webs Defined Volatility Xlu ETF | |||
| IMCV | 94.01 | -0.31 | -0.33% |
| iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF (IMCV) | |||
MERC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MERC and MAGN have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MERC and MAGN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MERC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MERC | 100% | -5.87% | ||
| MAGN - MERC | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.20% | ||
| CLW - MERC | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.91% | ||
| SLVM - MERC | 16% Poorly correlated | +2.10% | ||
| MATV - MERC | 13% Poorly correlated | +2.95% | ||
| ITP - MERC | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.22% | ||
More | ||||
SLVM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLVM has been loosely correlated with CLW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLVM jumps, then CLW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLVM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLVM | 100% | -0.62% | ||
| CLW - SLVM | 39% Loosely correlated | -2.42% | ||
| SUZ - SLVM | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.56% | ||
| MAGN - SLVM | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.23% | ||
| MATV - SLVM | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.15% | ||
| MERC - SLVM | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
More | ||||