Advertisement
SMC vs TRGP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMC is a Hold and TRGP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SMC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRGP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- SMC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TRGP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SMC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRGP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SMC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TRGP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
SMC (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +3.30% price change this week, while TRGP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -0.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
TRGP is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.04% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| SMC | TRGP | SMC / TRGP | |
| Capitalization | 288M | 36.5B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 126M | 4.5B | 3% |
| Gain YTD | -37.798 | -2.561 | 1,476% |
| P/E Ratio | 5.74 | 22.93 | 25% |
| Revenue | 482M | 17.1B | 3% |
| Total Cash | 20.9M | 140M | 15% |
| Total Debt | 1.08B | 16.9B | 6% |
SMC | TRGP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 65 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 13 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SMC's Valuation (50) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as TRGP (65) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that SMC’s stock grew similarly to TRGP’s over the last 12 months.
TRGP's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMC (53) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that TRGP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMC’s over the last 12 months.
TRGP's SMR Rating (18) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMC (96) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that TRGP’s stock grew significantly faster than SMC’s over the last 12 months.
SMC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as TRGP (48) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that SMC’s stock grew similarly to TRGP’s over the last 12 months.
SMC's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRGP (86) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that SMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRGP’s over the last 12 months.
| SMC | TRGP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 42% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 74% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 74% | 8 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 74% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JGRW | 26.67 | 0.14 | +0.55% |
| Jensen Quality Growth ETF | |||
| JUST | 93.90 | 0.36 | +0.38% |
| Goldman Sachs JUST US Large Cap Eq ETF | |||
| PBFB | 29.74 | 0.04 | +0.13% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Feb | |||
| FSEC | 44.40 | 0.02 | +0.03% |
| Fidelity Investment Grade Sec ETF | |||
| BRZU | 79.96 | -1.09 | -1.34% |
| Direxion Daily MSCI Brazil Bull 2X ETF | |||
SMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMC has been loosely correlated with ET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMC jumps, then ET could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMC | 100% | -1.67% | ||
| ET - SMC | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| OKE - SMC | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| TRGP - SMC | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| PAA - SMC | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| PAGP - SMC | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
More | ||||
TRGP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRGP has been closely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRGP jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRGP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRGP | 100% | +0.34% | ||
| OKE - TRGP | 85% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| KNTK - TRGP | 71% Closely correlated | -2.11% | ||
| ET - TRGP | 70% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| PAA - TRGP | 69% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| DTM - TRGP | 68% Closely correlated | +1.39% | ||
More | ||||