SMC
Price
$22.00
Change
+$0.99 (+4.71%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
269.32M
TRGP
Price
$162.30
Change
-$0.35 (-0.22%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
34.93B
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SMC vs TRGP

Header iconSMC vs TRGP Comparison
Open Charts SMC vs TRGPBanner chart's image
Summit Midstream
Price$22.00
Change+$0.99 (+4.71%)
Volume$53.91K
Capitalization269.32M
Targa Resources
Price$162.30
Change-$0.35 (-0.22%)
Volume$1.22M
Capitalization34.93B
SMC vs TRGP Comparison Chart in %
SMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SMC vs. TRGP commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMC is a Hold and TRGP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SMC: $22.00 vs. TRGP: $162.30)
Brand notoriety: SMC: Not notable vs. TRGP: Notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SMC: 63% vs. TRGP: 81%
Market capitalization -- SMC: $269.32M vs. TRGP: $34.93B
SMC [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $269.32M. TRGP’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $34.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $109.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $12.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SMC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRGP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SMC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRGP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRGP is a better buy in the long-term than SMC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRGP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SMC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TRGP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRGP is a better buy in the short-term than SMC.

Price Growth

SMC (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -2.44% price change this week, while TRGP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -6.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

TRGP is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.57% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRGP($34.9B) has a higher market cap than SMC($269M). TRGP has higher P/E ratio than SMC: TRGP (23.34) vs SMC (5.74). TRGP YTD gains are higher at: -7.675 vs. SMC (-41.768). TRGP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.5B vs. SMC (126M). TRGP has more cash in the bank: 113M vs. SMC (20.9M). SMC has less debt than TRGP: SMC (1.08B) vs TRGP (16.9B). TRGP has higher revenues than SMC: TRGP (17.1B) vs SMC (482M).
SMCTRGPSMC / TRGP
Capitalization269M34.9B1%
EBITDA126M4.5B3%
Gain YTD-41.768-7.675544%
P/E Ratio5.7423.3425%
Revenue482M17.1B3%
Total Cash20.9M113M18%
Total Debt1.08B16.9B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMC vs TRGP: Fundamental Ratings
SMC
TRGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5520
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5515
SMR RATING
1..100
9817
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8559
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3086
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6515

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMC's Valuation (56) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as TRGP (60) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that SMC’s stock grew similarly to TRGP’s over the last 12 months.

TRGP's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMC (55) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that TRGP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMC’s over the last 12 months.

TRGP's SMR Rating (17) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMC (98) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that TRGP’s stock grew significantly faster than SMC’s over the last 12 months.

TRGP's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as SMC (85) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that TRGP’s stock grew similarly to SMC’s over the last 12 months.

SMC's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRGP (86) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that SMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRGP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMCTRGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INDS37.820.34
+0.91%
Pacer Benchmark Industrial RE SCTR ETF
DFVE31.670.23
+0.73%
DoubleLine Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF
SHM48.11N/A
N/A
SPDR Nuveen ICE Short Term Muncpl Bd ETF
JBK25.53N/A
N/A
Lehman ABS Corp
HPS15.58-0.06
-0.38%
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III

SMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMC has been loosely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMC jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMC
1D Price
Change %
SMC100%
+4.71%
OKE - SMC
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
ET - SMC
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
TRGP - SMC
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
PAA - SMC
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
PAGP - SMC
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
More

TRGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRGP has been closely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRGP jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRGP
1D Price
Change %
TRGP100%
-0.22%
OKE - TRGP
87%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
KNTK - TRGP
78%
Closely correlated
-2.08%
ET - TRGP
73%
Closely correlated
-0.71%
PAA - TRGP
71%
Closely correlated
-0.77%
KMI - TRGP
71%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
More