Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMCWX vs TVFVX
SMCWX vs TVFVX Comparison
Open Charts SMCWX vs TVFVX
SMCWX vs TVFVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMCWX vs. TVFVX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMCWX is a Hold and TVFVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMCWX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. TVFVX (1.07B). TVFVX pays higher dividends than SMCWX: TVFVX (1.68) vs SMCWX (0.60). SMCWX was incepted earlier than TVFVX: SMCWX (36 years) vs TVFVX (17 years). TVFVX (1.39) is less costly to investors than SMCWX (1.03). SMCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. TVFVX (23.00). SMCWX has a lower initial minimum investment than TVFVX: SMCWX (250) vs TVFVX (2500). TVFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.28 vs. SMCWX (12.95). TVFVX return over 5 years is better than : 86.59 vs. SMCWX (-9.78).
| SMCWX | TVFVX | SMCWX / TVFVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.39 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.39 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.249 | 23.225 | 57% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89B | 1.07B | 8,349% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.68 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.95 | 31.28 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.86 | 52.26 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.78 | 86.59 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.59 | 101.95 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement