Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMFAX vs VMGIX
SMFAX vs VMGIX Comparison
Open Charts SMFAX vs VMGIX
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr A
Price$33.03
Change+$0.25 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets660.69M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Investor
Price$112.66
Change+$0.71 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.45B
SMFAX vs VMGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMFAX vs. VMGIX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMFAX is a Buy and VMGIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGIX has more cash in the bank: 31.5B vs. SMFAX (661M). VMGIX pays higher dividends than SMFAX: VMGIX (0.52) vs SMFAX (0.00). SMFAX was incepted earlier than VMGIX: SMFAX (13 years) vs VMGIX (19 years). SMFAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than VMGIX (0.19). SMFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. VMGIX (21.00). SMFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGIX: SMFAX (2500) vs VMGIX (3000). VMGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.83 vs. SMFAX (12.34). VMGIX return over 5 years is better than : 67.84 vs. SMFAX (29.16).
| SMFAX | VMGIX | SMFAX / VMGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.19 | 637% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.19 | 732% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.723 | 12.192 | 72% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 661M | 31.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.34 | 23.83 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.21 | 55.64 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.16 | 67.84 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.12 | 169.62 | 48% |