Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMFPX vs TORCX
SMFPX vs TORCX Comparison
Open Charts SMFPX vs TORCX
SMFPX vs TORCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMFPX vs. TORCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMFPX is a Hold and TORCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TORCX has more cash in the bank: 4.04B vs. SMFPX (1.42B). TORCX (2.76) and SMFPX (2.67) have matching dividends . SMFPX was incepted earlier than TORCX: SMFPX (14 years) vs TORCX (14 years). SMFPX (2.13) is less costly to investors than TORCX (1.91). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. TORCX (18.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than TORCX: SMFPX (1000) vs TORCX (2500). TORCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.21 vs. SMFPX (24.19). TORCX return over 5 years is better than : 161.22 vs. SMFPX (137.27).
| SMFPX | TORCX | SMFPX / TORCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.91 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 1.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.861 | 28.364 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.42B | 4.04B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 2.76 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.19 | 29.21 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.64 | 96.92 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 137.27 | 161.22 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.04 | 143.98 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement