Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs SPAM
SMH vs SPAM Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs SPAM
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$252.73
Change+$1.43 (+0.57%)
Volume$5.59M
Net Assets23.63B
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
Price$32.33
Change+$0.39 (+1.22%)
Volume$1.25K
Net Assets1.91M
SMH vs SPAM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. SPAM commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Buy and SPAM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 23.6B vs. SPAM (1.91M). SPAM has a higher annual dividend yield than SMH: SPAM (10.090) vs SMH (4.361). SMH was incepted earlier than SPAM: SMH (13 years) vs SPAM (2 years). SMH (0.35) and SPAM (0.35) have comparable expense ratios . SMH has a higher turnover SPAM (9.00) vs SPAM (9.00).
| SMH | SPAM | SMH / SPAM | |
| Gain YTD | 4.361 | 10.090 | 43% |
| Net Assets | 23.6B | 1.91M | 1,234,310% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 | 100% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 9.00 | 200% |
| Yield | 0.45 | 0.12 | 367% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | about 1 month ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | about 1 month ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 84% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | about 1 month ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OSCV | 35.81 | 0.47 | +1.33% |
| Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF | |||
| BUFB | 33.00 | 0.26 | +0.79% |
| Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF | |||
| FLRN | 30.71 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| SPDR® Blmbg Inv Grd Flt Rt ETF | |||
| ESIX | 28.82 | N/A | N/A |
| SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF | |||
| FXB | 130.07 | -0.37 | -0.28% |
| Invesco CcyShrs® British Pound Stlg | |||
SPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPAM has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPAM jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | +1.21% | ||
| PANW - SPAM | 76% Closely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| CYBR - SPAM | 71% Closely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| ZS - SPAM | 71% Closely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| S - SPAM | 68% Closely correlated | +1.32% | ||
| TENB - SPAM | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
More | ||||